2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback from OB stars on their parent cloud: gas exhaustion rather than gas ejection

Abstract: Context. Stellar feedback from high-mass stars shapes the interstellar medium, and thereby impacts gas that will form future generations of stars. However, due to our inability to track the time evolution of individual molecular clouds, quantifying the exact role of stellar feedback on their star formation history is an observationally challenging task. Aims. In the present study, we take advantage of the unique properties of the G316.75-00.00 massive-star forming ridge to determine how stellar feedback from O… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
5
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the accretion rates in our simulation may maintain our stars bloated until they reach the main sequence as an intermediate-mass star and ionization feedback would not play a role in that initial phase, as also confirmed observationally by the high luminosity of young, massive protostars (Ginsburg et al 2017). There is also tentative observational evidence that stellar radiation cannot strongly affect the mass inflow when this occurs through dense filaments (Watkins et al 2019). Radiative feedback mechanisms may also assist the formation of massive stars, by suppressing fragmentation in the neighborhood of a massive star, which increases the mass reservoir available for its growth, while preventing the formation of lower-mass stars (Krumholz et al 2007).…”
Section: Caveats and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For example, the accretion rates in our simulation may maintain our stars bloated until they reach the main sequence as an intermediate-mass star and ionization feedback would not play a role in that initial phase, as also confirmed observationally by the high luminosity of young, massive protostars (Ginsburg et al 2017). There is also tentative observational evidence that stellar radiation cannot strongly affect the mass inflow when this occurs through dense filaments (Watkins et al 2019). Radiative feedback mechanisms may also assist the formation of massive stars, by suppressing fragmentation in the neighborhood of a massive star, which increases the mass reservoir available for its growth, while preventing the formation of lower-mass stars (Krumholz et al 2007).…”
Section: Caveats and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In the present context, the radial velocity difference across a filament may be a discriminating signature of filament formation by turbulence (as here). The data presented in Ragan et al (2012) and Watkins et al (2019) show some indication for velocity gradients perpendicular to the filament long axes, but on larger scales than those simulated here, and rotation would produce a similar effect. Arzoumanian et al (2018) find evidence for redand blue-shifted 13 CO emission on alternate sides of a ∼1 pc-long filament identified in C 18 O, which they attributed to interaction between the filament and an extended sheet-like structure.…”
Section: R E S U Lt Ssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…where G is the gravitational constant; M line is the line mass estimated as M line = µm H N H 2 d, where the N H 2 is the H 2 column density along the skeleton and d is defined as half of the S242 filament width (∼0.4 pc). Furthermore, for a filament the virial parameters could be calculated as (Ostriker 1964;Watkins et al 2019)…”
Section: Self-gravity As the Cause Of Increased Velocity Dispersion?mentioning
confidence: 99%