Formation of Procedural Justice Judgments in Legal Negotiation

Hollander-Blumoff, Rebecca

doi:10.1007/s10726-016-9498-2

Cited by 21 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These distinctions suggest variation in the extent to which the four PJ principles are relational. Experiments by Lind, Tyler, and Huo (1997) and Hollander-Blumoff (2017) showed that PJ judgments were strongly influenced by perceived relationships. More specifically, courtesy and respect were the key elements of those judgments.…”

Section: Pjmentioning

confidence: 99%

Justice Matters: Peace Negotiations, Stable Agreements, and Durable Peace

Druckman

Wagner

2017

Journal of Conflict Resolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Attaining durable peace (DP) after a civil war has proven to be a major challenge, as many negotiated agreements lapse into violence. How can negotiations to terminate civil wars be conducted and peace agreements formulated to contribute to lasting peace? This question is addressed in this study with a novel data set. Focusing on justice, we assess relationships between process (procedural justice [PJ]) and outcome (distributive justice [DJ]) justice on the one hand and stable agreements (SA) and DP on the other. Analyses of fifty peace agreements, which were reached from 1957 to 2008, showed a path from PJ to DJ to SA to DP: The justice variables were instrumental in enhancing both short- and long-term peace. These variables had a stronger impact on DP than a variety of contextual- and case-related factors. The empirical link between justice and peace has implications for the way that peace negotiations are structured.

show abstract

Section: Pjmentioning

confidence: 99%

Justice Matters: Peace Negotiations, Stable Agreements, and Durable Peace

Druckman

Wagner

2017

Journal of Conflict Resolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These two theories are derived from organizational justice theory explaining the specific formation of justice perceptions. The core viewpoint of the fairness heuristic theory is that the effect of procedural justice is stronger when employees are uncertain about the trustworthiness of the authority rendering the decision (Hollander-Blumoff, 2017; Lind and Van den Bos, 2002; Tyler and Lind, 1992). Procedural justice refers to the fairness of the procedures used to make decisions (Thibaut and Walker, 1975).…”

Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast, some studies found that the appointment of employee representatives by enterprise managers was perceived as an injustice because employees perceived a lack of process control. In addition, adjudicative procedures were perceived as more just than EMCs because of their independence and neutrality (Hollander-Blumoff, 2017). Different from mediation, where mediators sometimes provide ideas, suggestions or formal proposals for settlement, arbitrators listen to the arguments of both sides, review whatever evidence has been presented, and make a decision (Shen, 2007).…”

Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is mediation the preferred procedure in labour dispute resolution systems? Evidence from employer–employee matched data in China

Feng

Xie

2019

Journal of Industrial Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores procedural preferences in the historical development of labour dispute resolution systems at the national level and employees’ pre-experience preference to resolve disputes at the individual level. Drawing on two datasets – one from national public statistics and one from China’s employer–employee matched data – we find that mediation has fluctuated in its use and efficacy, and it has re-emerged as an important method to stabilize labour relations. Employees choose internal mediation only if they feel that the enterprise’s mediation committee is selected fairly. Organizational structure factors, such as the enterprise’s size and the effectiveness of the Staff and Workers Representative Congress, moderate the relationship between employees’ perceptions of justice and procedural preferences. This study contributes to the dispute resolution literature by highlighting the interactions between individual perceptions of justice and organizational factors of procedural preference. Additionally, practical implications are offered to aid in the design of dispute resolution systems and improve organizational justice.

show abstract

“…However, distributive justice restricts the analysis of perceived justice to only distribution but not procedures (Grace, 2016;Leventhal, 1980;Tanya & Kristina, 2012). Therefore, the concept of procedural justice is the progress in equity theories when scholars admit that equity judgement is not only based on the allocation of resources but also on the procedures related to that allocation (Hollander-Blumoff, 2017;Kadefors, 2005). In this context, procedural justice refers to the perceived fairness of procedures used in the decision-making process of the allocation.…”

Section: Procedural Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The concept was introduced in the seventies by Thibaut and Walker (1975), who showed that people find procedures to be fair when they can voice their opinion (i.e., process control) and when they can influence decision outcomes (i.e., decision control). The procedural justice is, in some cases, even more important than the distributive justice (Hollander-Blumoff, 2017;C. Patel, Budhwar, & Varma, 2012).…”

Section: Procedural Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

Equity issues in land acquisition: A source of delays in large construction projects in Vietnam

Vu¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Delays in construction projects have been a recurring and global problem for decades. In many countries, particularly developing countries, delays in land acquisition are considered one of the largest contributors of delays in large construction projects. In Vietnam, one key cause of these delays stems from equity perceptions of land-acquired communities who perceive themselves to be disadvantaged or let down by the land acquisition process. However, the formation of these equity perceptions has not been sufficiently investigated. Further, the relationship between equity issues on perceptions of land-acquired households and delays in construction projects has also not been clarified by existing literature that cannot help to adequately figure out solutions to these delays.Therefore, this research aims to investigate the formation of equity perceptions of land-acquired households and the relationship between equity issues and delays in construction projects. To implement this aim, a theoretical model is proposed that link between equity issues, comparisons, equity perceptions, and responses of landacquired communities causing delays in large construction projects in Vietnam.After that, the case study approach and semi-structured interviews of 40 landacquired households are conducted across two case studies, which are two large construction projects in Vietnam. Content and thematic analysis of the data collected was performed using Nvivo software to verify the four propositions issues and delays, which can help to address minimise delays in large construction projects. In addition, the principles of equity may be applied to project management to improve project performance, which in turn, will enable more successful project outcomes.

show abstract

Formation of Procedural Justice Judgments in Legal Negotiation

Cited by 21 publications

References 24 publications

Justice Matters: Peace Negotiations, Stable Agreements, and Durable Peace

Justice Matters: Peace Negotiations, Stable Agreements, and Durable Peace

Is mediation the preferred procedure in labour dispute resolution systems? Evidence from employer–employee matched data in China

Equity issues in land acquisition: A source of delays in large construction projects in Vietnam

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About