2012
DOI: 10.1134/s0031918x1203012x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of nanocrystalline structure in the amorphous Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy upon severe thermomechanical treatment and the size effect of the thermoelastic martensitic B2 ↔ B19 transformation

Abstract: The results of the comparative analysis of the Ti 50 Ni 25 Cu 25 alloy structures produced in the initial amorphous state by rapid quenching from the melt (RQM), after severe plastic deformation by torsion under high pressure (HPT), and postdeformation heat treatment (PHT) are presented. The study was carried out using neutron and X ray diffraction, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, and measurements of electrical properties. The initially amorphous alloy has been established to nanocrystallize aft… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis also demonstrates that in the MS Ti 50 Ni 25 Cu 25 alloy, HPT processing and subsequent annealing produce markedly finer grains than annealing of the initial MS alloy . For instance, the grain size in the MS Ti 50 Ni 25 Cu 25 alloy after annealing at 450 °C for 10 min reaches 1.5 µm (with martensite plate observed within the grains) (Figure a), whereas in the MS Ti 50 Ni 25 Cu 25 alloy subjected to HPT and subsequent annealing at 450 °C the grain size is below 100 nm (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis also demonstrates that in the MS Ti 50 Ni 25 Cu 25 alloy, HPT processing and subsequent annealing produce markedly finer grains than annealing of the initial MS alloy . For instance, the grain size in the MS Ti 50 Ni 25 Cu 25 alloy after annealing at 450 °C for 10 min reaches 1.5 µm (with martensite plate observed within the grains) (Figure a), whereas in the MS Ti 50 Ni 25 Cu 25 alloy subjected to HPT and subsequent annealing at 450 °C the grain size is below 100 nm (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, in the case of Nd–Fe–B MS amorphous alloys, HPT processing leads to a separation of elements and nanocrystallization of α‐Fe‐nanocrystals (with a size of ≈20 nm) in the amorphous phase . At the same time, HPT processing of the melt‐spun amorphous Ti–Ni–Cu alloy does not lead to intensive nanocrystallization . In this connection, of great interest are more detailed studies of the evolution of the amorphous structure in this Ti–Ni–Cu alloy during HPT processing and its influence on the alloy's properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the glass transition temperature of MS TiNiCu amorphous alloy is about 320 С, the crystallization temperature is 450 С [24,25], which is noticeably higher than the highest employed temperature of HPT processing (150 С). However, heating during HPT processing can play in important role [26,27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to neutron diffraction data, the degree of long range atomic order η in this alloy is equal to 0.90 ± 0.05 [22]. No diagrams of phase equilibria in these ternary alloys have been revealed in the literature, except for the TiNi-TiCu quasi binary section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessity of obtaining substantially higher strength properties of the alloys in the form of small dimension semiproducts with the retention or even improvement of a complex of functional parameters of the SME has initiated one of the approaches, prima rily in the cases of ternary Ti-Ni-Cu alloys, that is based on the use of methods of ultrarapid quenching from the melt (RQM), in particular, the method of free jet melt spinning, to produce very long, very thin ribbons with an SME [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%