1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0733-5210(87)80052-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of enzyme resistant starch during autoclaving of wheat starch: Studies in vitro and in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protein solubility in relation to heat treatment was determined as percent protein solubilized in 0.2% KOH (Araba and Dale 1990). Gelatinized starch was measured as glucose release by amyloglucosidase (Bjorck et al 1987). Aliphatic glucosinolates were determined as trimethylsilyl derivatives of the de-sulfo glucosinolates following extraction, purification, and enzymatic removal of sulfate groups (Daun et al 1989).…”
Section: Ingredient Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Protein solubility in relation to heat treatment was determined as percent protein solubilized in 0.2% KOH (Araba and Dale 1990). Gelatinized starch was measured as glucose release by amyloglucosidase (Bjorck et al 1987). Aliphatic glucosinolates were determined as trimethylsilyl derivatives of the de-sulfo glucosinolates following extraction, purification, and enzymatic removal of sulfate groups (Daun et al 1989).…”
Section: Ingredient Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelleted or expanded whole canola/pea (WCP) and whole canola/canola meal (WCC) blends were compared in broiler chick diets to the untreated blends in order to determine their effectiveness in improving chick growth performance, N-retention, protein digestibility, fat digestibility, and AME N . Protein solubility in 0.2% potassium hydroxide (Araba and Dale 1990) and starch gelatinization (WCP only) (Bjorck et al 1987) were used to quantify the extent of heat treatment. Other parameters measured included the amino acid composition of the blends as well as destructive effect of heat on glucosinolates and MAI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of starch digestion varies with the type of starch (Biliaderis, 1991;Naguleswaran, Vasanthan, Hoover, & Bressler, 2014), the surface to volume ratio of ungelatinised granules, the presence of other plant chemicals (Nebesny, Rosicka, & Tkaczyk, 2004;Noda et al, 2008;Snow & Odea, 1981), the surface porosity of ungelatinised granules (Sujka & Jamroz, 2007) and the degree to which the starch is gelatinised (Wang & Copeland, 2013). The addition of fibre during cooking of the food is reported to limit the extent to which starch is gelatinised, increasing the proportion of RS (Bjorck et al, 1987) and "masking" the starch granules (Parada & Aguilera, 2011). The rate of digestion of gelatinised starch can be modelled in various ways although during the early stages of digestion, regressions of L n transformed starch concentration with time were shown to accurately model the data for the digestion of gelatinised starch from various sources .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a view of starch digestion, common starch contains a higher percentage of digestible fraction (digestible starch, DS) and a lower percentage of the nondigestible fraction called as enzymatic resistant starch (RS) in the major staple starchy crops such as rice and wheat [3][4][5]. RS is defined as 'the sum of starch and the products of starch degradation not absorbed in the small intestine of healthy individuals' [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%