2023
DOI: 10.1063/5.0156680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of 2D GaXY (X = S, Se; Y = F, Cl, Br, I) with enhanced piezoelectricity via decomposition of Ga-monochalcogenide by halogenation

Abstract: Motivated by the excellent electronic and optoelectronic properties of two-dimensional (2D) Ga-monochalcogenides, we systematically investigated the effect of halogenation on physical properties of monolayer GaX (X = S, Se) by the first-principles calculations. Crystal lattices of GaX were decomposed with the halogen atom being absorbed on top of the Ga atom. Unexpectedly, a series of monolayer GaXY (X = S, Se; Y = F, Cl, Br, I) was formed. Except for GaXF, other monolayer GaXY has good structural stability at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential difference Δ E C (Δ E V ) between E CBM vac ( E VBM vac ) and reduction potential (oxidation potential) is widely viewed as the driving force for the HER (OER) process, calculated by normalΔ E C = E C B M v a c E normalH + / normalH 2 normalΔ E V = E normalH 2 normalO / normalO 2 E V B M v a c The values of Δ E C and Δ E V are summarized in Table . The Δ E C values (0.75–1.79 eV) of Y 2 Se 2 XX′ monolayers are larger than those of PtSSe (Δ E C = 0.44 eV), GaSeBr (Δ E C = 0.52 eV), and LiGaTe 2 (Δ E C = 0.58 eV) . Meanwhile, the Δ E V values (0.99–1.37 eV) of Y 2 Se 2 XX′ monolayers outperform those of MoSSe (Δ E V = 0.65 eV), SnN 3 (Δ E V = 0.34 eV), and GeSe (Δ E V = 0.83 eV) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential difference Δ E C (Δ E V ) between E CBM vac ( E VBM vac ) and reduction potential (oxidation potential) is widely viewed as the driving force for the HER (OER) process, calculated by normalΔ E C = E C B M v a c E normalH + / normalH 2 normalΔ E V = E normalH 2 normalO / normalO 2 E V B M v a c The values of Δ E C and Δ E V are summarized in Table . The Δ E C values (0.75–1.79 eV) of Y 2 Se 2 XX′ monolayers are larger than those of PtSSe (Δ E C = 0.44 eV), GaSeBr (Δ E C = 0.52 eV), and LiGaTe 2 (Δ E C = 0.58 eV) . Meanwhile, the Δ E V values (0.99–1.37 eV) of Y 2 Se 2 XX′ monolayers outperform those of MoSSe (Δ E V = 0.65 eV), SnN 3 (Δ E V = 0.34 eV), and GeSe (Δ E V = 0.83 eV) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential difference Δ E C (Δ E V ) between E CBM vac ( E VBM vac ) and reduction potential (oxidation potential) is widely viewed as the driving force for the HER (OER) process, calculated by The values of Δ E C and Δ E V are summarized in Table . The Δ E C values (0.75–1.79 eV) of Y 2 Se 2 XX′ monolayers are larger than those of PtSSe (Δ E C = 0.44 eV), GaSeBr (Δ E C = 0.52 eV), and LiGaTe 2 (Δ E C = 0.58 eV) . Meanwhile, the Δ E V values (0.99–1.37 eV) of Y 2 Se 2 XX′ monolayers outperform those of MoSSe (Δ E V = 0.65 eV), SnN 3 (Δ E V = 0.34 eV), and GeSe (Δ E V = 0.83 eV) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%