2016
DOI: 10.3390/cryst6010012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation Mechanism of Porous Cu3Sn Intermetallic Compounds by High Current Stressing at High Temperatures in Low-Bump-Height Solder Joints

Abstract: Electromigration tests of SnAg solder bump samples with 15 µm bump height and Cu under-bump-metallization (UBM) were performed. The test conditions were 1.45ˆ10 4 A/cm 2 at 185˝C and 1.20ˆ10 4 A/cm 2 at 0˝C. A porous Cu 3 Sn intermetallic compound (IMC) structure was observed to form within the bumps after several hundred hours of current stressing. In direct comparison, annealing alone at 185˝C will take more than 1000 h for porous Cu 3 Sn to form, and it will not form at 170˝C even after 2000 h. Here we prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 18 shows the cross-section morphology of the interface between the Cu and Sn layers in the samples with and without the TFMG barrier layer just after solder joining and after aging at 125 • C for 500 h. In the sample without the barrier layer, bilayer IMCs with a thick scallop-like Cu 6 Sn 5 of 7-8 µm close to the Sn matrix and a thin Cu 3 Sn of 0.5 µm close to the Cu substrate were formed at both interfaces after solder joining. These experimental results are in good agreement with the data in the literature [44]. When aged at 125 • C after 500 h, the interfacial Cu 6 Sn 5 and Cu 3 Sn IMCs grew to 9-10 µm and 0.5-1 µm in thickness, respectively.…”
Section: Imc Formation With Different Barrier Layers Via Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 18 shows the cross-section morphology of the interface between the Cu and Sn layers in the samples with and without the TFMG barrier layer just after solder joining and after aging at 125 • C for 500 h. In the sample without the barrier layer, bilayer IMCs with a thick scallop-like Cu 6 Sn 5 of 7-8 µm close to the Sn matrix and a thin Cu 3 Sn of 0.5 µm close to the Cu substrate were formed at both interfaces after solder joining. These experimental results are in good agreement with the data in the literature [44]. When aged at 125 • C after 500 h, the interfacial Cu 6 Sn 5 and Cu 3 Sn IMCs grew to 9-10 µm and 0.5-1 µm in thickness, respectively.…”
Section: Imc Formation With Different Barrier Layers Via Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“… Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Cu/Sn diffusion coupled with Kirkendall void formation at the Cu 3 Sn layer (a) without electromigration effect [ 76 ] and (b) with electromigration effect [ 95 ]. …”
Section: Reliability Issues Concerning Imcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the equation: Cu 6 Sn 5 → 2 Cu 3 Sn + 3 Sn would become Cu 6 Sn 5 → 2 Cu 3 Sn + void which the void ratio was 41.4% calculated by material density. [12] Based on the conditions, an ideal cubic unit cell representing the effective porous Cu 3 Sn was shown in the Fig.6a. There were 8 voids at corners and 6 voids in the 6 sides representing uniform porous structure.…”
Section: Td2-2mentioning
confidence: 99%