2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10569-016-9693-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation dynamics in geostationary ring

Abstract: A relative motion model for a satellite formation composed of two Earth-orbiting spacecraft located in the geostationary ring is developed taking into account major gravitational and non-gravitational forces. A previously existing model featuring perturbation due to J 2 is enhanced by the perturbations due to solar radiation pressure arising from unequal area-to-mass ratios, as well as the secular and long-periodic gravitational perturbations due to the Sun and the Moon. The extended relative motion model is v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ≈ 4.56 × 10 −6 Nm −2 is the constant of the SRP, accounts for the mean reflectivity of the surface, A is the spacecraft cross-sectional area assumed constant, m is the mass of the spacecraft, AU is the Astronomical Unit, and the norm of ⊙ /‖ ⊙ ‖ 3 ⋅ AU 2 approximates 1. SRP model in (10) has been widely used in analyzing the effect of SRP on spacecraft absolute orbit and relative motion between two spacecraft [12,39,40]. It is noted that model of differential SRP perturbation in (10) is derived with assumption that the normal vector of spacecraft's surface points in the direction of the Sun [41].…”
Section: Differential 2 Perturbation the Most Important Nonsphericalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where ≈ 4.56 × 10 −6 Nm −2 is the constant of the SRP, accounts for the mean reflectivity of the surface, A is the spacecraft cross-sectional area assumed constant, m is the mass of the spacecraft, AU is the Astronomical Unit, and the norm of ⊙ /‖ ⊙ ‖ 3 ⋅ AU 2 approximates 1. SRP model in (10) has been widely used in analyzing the effect of SRP on spacecraft absolute orbit and relative motion between two spacecraft [12,39,40]. It is noted that model of differential SRP perturbation in (10) is derived with assumption that the normal vector of spacecraft's surface points in the direction of the Sun [41].…”
Section: Differential 2 Perturbation the Most Important Nonsphericalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeled is used in numerical simulations to evaluate the performance of the analytical solutions and the robustness of the designed control law, which is discussed in detail later. Given the large distance to the Sun as compared with the distance between the spacecraft, it suffices to assume that the distance to the Sun and the unit direction-to-the-Sun vector are the same for both spacecraft [12]. In this way, the differential SRP perturbation can be represented as…”
Section: Differential 2 Perturbation the Most Important Nonsphericalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An application of averaging theory, in conjunction with the Gauss variational equations (GVE) and Lagrange planetary equations (LPE), provides an analytical framework for describing the secular and long-period effects caused by conservative and nonconservative perturbations on the ROE. Several authors have leveraged this advantage to solve the variational equations in closed form, providing relative motion dynamics models that are valid in the presence of higher-order geopotential, third-body gravity, atmospheric drag, and solar radiation pressure effects [21][22][23]. Furthermore, D'Amico and Montenbruck [12] and D'Amico [24] extensively formulated a powerful connection relating the mean ROE state of Eq.…”
Section: Development Of the Dynamical System Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumption 3 As per Assumption 2, the differential effects of atmospheric drag, solar radiation pressure, and third-body gravity are negligible compared to the forces caused by the primary body [13,87];…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%