IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2011.6161074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation control of multi-agent systems with double integrator dynamics using delayed static output feedback

Abstract: In this paper a network of vehicles moving in a two dimensional plane, described by double integrator dynamics, is stabilized by a novel distributed control methodology, to maintain a formation. The distributed control architecture employs static output feedback using an artificial delay. Delays in communication of the relative information are exploited to stabilize the network system using state output feedback of position information only. The synthesis of the controller gains and the level of artificial del… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider that the motion of each agent is described by single integrator dynamics 1 , as commonly used in literature [Cao et al (2007), Dimarogonas et al (2009), Pavone & Frazzoli (2006)]. Note that other common modelling choices for multi robotcontrol also include, for example, double-integrator dynamics [Deshpande et al (2011), Cao et al (2011), Ren et al (2008)] or unicycle kinematic models ; Bishop (2011a); Basiri et al (2010)]. We then have:q…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider that the motion of each agent is described by single integrator dynamics 1 , as commonly used in literature [Cao et al (2007), Dimarogonas et al (2009), Pavone & Frazzoli (2006)]. Note that other common modelling choices for multi robotcontrol also include, for example, double-integrator dynamics [Deshpande et al (2011), Cao et al (2011), Ren et al (2008)] or unicycle kinematic models ; Bishop (2011a); Basiri et al (2010)]. We then have:q…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between formation control and the consensus problem is suggested through the use of graph theoretical methods in papers as [7,42,44]. However, most of the theoretically oriented approach to the formation problem is done by means of consensus analysis on networks composed solely by double integrators systems, [1,13,16,27,30,32,62]. This special kind of dynamics ease the consensus analysis on the networks greatly, but are difficult to generalize into more complex scenarios.…”
Section: Loopless Laplacian Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M , represent decision variables which parameterize the discretized Lyapunov functional from Proposition 5.22 in [14]. For specific details of the LMIs in (22) see [6]. Provided the gains k 1 and k 2 , the delay τ , and the decay rate α are fixed, the LMI in (22) provides a tractable feasibility check for stability for the system in (21).…”
Section: Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, see for example [3]- [5] to name but a few, state feedback has been used to obtain consensus. Consensus algorithms using double integrator dynamics, representing position and velocity information, have also been applied for formation control; see [4] - [6] and the references therein. However the measurement of all the states of a system is not viable in many practical problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%