2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1034(200004/06)35:2<53::aid-gj837>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation and emplacement ages of the SSZ-type Neotethyan ophiolites in Central Anatolia, Turkey: palaeotectonic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ATB is characterized by a Neoproterozoic‐Cambrian crystalline basement overlain by thick Paleozoic‐early Cenozoic carbonate‐dominated successions (e.g., Okay, ; Robertson et al, ); the terms Anatolide and Tauride refer to the metamorphic and nonmetamorphic domains, respectively. Based on its similar Paleozoic‐Mesozoic stratigraphy and history of metamorphism, the Kırşehir Block is regarded either as the metamorphosed northern margin of the ATB (Poisson et al, ; Şengör & Yılmaz, ; Yalınız et al, ) or more controversially as a distinct terrane separated from the ATB by the Inner Tauride suture (e.g., Görür et al, ; Parlak et al, ). Recent work also demonstrates that eastern Anatolia is underlain by a continental basement with a similar lithology and age to that of the ATB to the west (Topuz et al, ; Yılmaz et al, ).…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ATB is characterized by a Neoproterozoic‐Cambrian crystalline basement overlain by thick Paleozoic‐early Cenozoic carbonate‐dominated successions (e.g., Okay, ; Robertson et al, ); the terms Anatolide and Tauride refer to the metamorphic and nonmetamorphic domains, respectively. Based on its similar Paleozoic‐Mesozoic stratigraphy and history of metamorphism, the Kırşehir Block is regarded either as the metamorphosed northern margin of the ATB (Poisson et al, ; Şengör & Yılmaz, ; Yalınız et al, ) or more controversially as a distinct terrane separated from the ATB by the Inner Tauride suture (e.g., Görür et al, ; Parlak et al, ). Recent work also demonstrates that eastern Anatolia is underlain by a continental basement with a similar lithology and age to that of the ATB to the west (Topuz et al, ; Yılmaz et al, ).…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metamorphic soles are generally interpreted as marking the initiation of intra-oceanic subduction, although the associated intra-oceanic arcs are generally not recognized. Despite the well-described exposures of Tethyan supra-subduction ophiolites found as obducted on Gondwana-derived continental fragments (Çakır, 2009;Dilek et al, 1999;Hässig et al, 2013aHässig et al, , 2013bHébert et al, 2012;Malpas et al, 2003;Önen, 2003;Robertson, 2002;Searle and Cox, 1999;Thuizat et al, 1981;Yalınız et al, 1996Yalınız et al, , 2000aYalınız et al, , 2000b, presumed intra-oceanic arcs are generally not well defined within the Alpine-Himalayan range with an exception of the well-known Cretaceous Kohistan Arc exposed in http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.07.005 1367-9120/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. the north of Pakistan (Coward et al, 1987;Petterson, 2010;Schaltegger et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the Tavşanlı Zone comprises, from highest to lowest structural levels, Eocene and Neogene siliciclastic and volcanic rocks of the peripheral Eskişehir foreland basin, obducted Cretaceous ophiolites of the İAESZ, metamorphosed Paleozoic basement, and Late Cretaceous and Eocene‐early Oligocene granitoids intruded into the ophiolites and basement (Harris et al, ; Okay et al, ; Okay & Whitney, ; Şengüler & Izladi, ; Sherlock et al, ). The HT/LP Kırşehir Block in central Anatolia (also known as the Kırşehir Massif or Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex) is arguably either a distinct terrane (e.g., Görür et al, ) or the lateral continuation of the Tavşanlı Zone (van Hinsbergen et al, ; Plunder et al, ; Yaliniz et al, ).…”
Section: Geological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) In the diachronous promontory collision model, the KB was a promontory of the ATB. Initial collision of the apex of the KB in the latest Cretaceous preceded collision in western and eastern Anatolia (Figure a; Floyd et al, ; Kaymakci et al, ; Meijers et al, ; Yaliniz et al, ). Ophiolitic belts at the southern KB were from foreland‐propagating thrust nappes from the İAESZ not an Intra‐Tauride Suture Zone.…”
Section: Geological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%