2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57666-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Models and Analysis for Self-adaptive Cyber-physical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They validate their approach using formal specified MAPE-K templates that encode design expertise for a family of selfadaptive systems. Authors of Giese (2016) also present formal models and analysis for self-adaptive cyber-physical systems. They analyze the challenges face self-adaptive cyber-physical systems and outline their results through a generic approach based on extensions of graph transformations systems called SMARTOS.…”
Section: Formal Methods For Complex Adaptive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They validate their approach using formal specified MAPE-K templates that encode design expertise for a family of selfadaptive systems. Authors of Giese (2016) also present formal models and analysis for self-adaptive cyber-physical systems. They analyze the challenges face self-adaptive cyber-physical systems and outline their results through a generic approach based on extensions of graph transformations systems called SMARTOS.…”
Section: Formal Methods For Complex Adaptive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many works, researchers tried to apply formal methods to verify the correctness of complex systems where they applied different concepts such as the process algebra CSP (Bartels and Kleine 2011), SOTA (Abeywickrama and Zambonelli 2012), MAPE-K (Iglesia and Weyns 2015), SMARTOS (Giese 2016), and LTL (Sadraddini and Belta 2017). In these works, researchers proved that the application of formal methods highly improve the security and correctness of complex systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%