2006
DOI: 10.5771/0949-6181-2006-4-305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal and informal ways of learning in employer-provided further training in East and West German enterprises: Results from a large-scale establishment survey

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous research for Germany has provided mixed results. While empirical studies clearly show a positive association between establishment size and training incidence, results on the relationship between size and the share of employees trained range from negative (Allaart et al 2009) to positive (Brussig and Leber 2006).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, previous research for Germany has provided mixed results. While empirical studies clearly show a positive association between establishment size and training incidence, results on the relationship between size and the share of employees trained range from negative (Allaart et al 2009) to positive (Brussig and Leber 2006).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Union density is included, expressed as the percentage of employees who are union members. Dummy variables are included to control for membership of an employers' association and additionally for regular use of job rotation for employee development, since it is plausible that job rotation may be used as a substitute for formal training (Brussig and Leber 2006). Chow tests of structural stability are applied to test for longitudinal changes (Gujarati 1995: 263 -64).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no legal framework regulating the content, financing or structure of such training. Employer provided further training is an investment in workers' human capital that aims at a better understanding of, or coping with, current job tasks (Brussig and Leber 2006). Usually further training takes place after an apprenticeship training and/or an initial period of work experience (Gerlach and Jirjahn 2001).…”
Section: Employer Provided Further Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous research for Germany has provided mixed results. While empirical studies clearly show a positive association between establishment size and training incidence, results on the relationship between size and the share of employees trained range from negative (Allaart et al 2009) to positive (Brussig and Leber 2006).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%