2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2018.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forgetting in multi-agent modal logics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We need some definitions first. Fang et al [13] introduced the projection operations on CFs. When a CF τ is represented as a tree, the operation τ ↓ prunes the leaves of this tree, and τ ↓l prunes the bottom l levels of the tree.…”
Section: Definition 6 ([19] Canonical Formulas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need some definitions first. Fang et al [13] introduced the projection operations on CFs. When a CF τ is represented as a tree, the operation τ ↓ prunes the leaves of this tree, and τ ↓l prunes the bottom l levels of the tree.…”
Section: Definition 6 ([19] Canonical Formulas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, computing forgetting results in S5 is reduced to compute the one in PL [26]. Forgetting was recently extended to multi-agent modal logics [27]. It is showed that computing forgetting results of formulas in disjunctive normal form is feasible in polynomial time [28].…”
Section: Forgettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) each prime implicate of φ is equivalent to some conjunct c j ; (c) every c j is a prime implicate of φ s.t. A definition of forgetting for modal logics is defined in (French 2006) and it is further investigated in (Fang, Liu, and van Ditmarsch 2016). Definition 2.7.…”
Section: The Multi-agent Modal Logic K Nmentioning
confidence: 99%