2019
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest streams are important sources for nitrous oxide emissions

Abstract: Streams and river networks are increasingly recognized as significant sources for the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). N2O is a transformation product of nitrogenous compounds in soil, sediment and water. Agricultural areas are considered a particular hotspot for emissions because of the large input of nitrogen (N) fertilizers applied on arable land. However, there is little information on N2O emissions from forest streams although they constitute a major part of the total stream network globally. Here, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The N 2 O concentrations measured in this study, at 0.22 to 4.41 g N 2 O liter Ϫ1 (58 to 1,217% saturated), were comparable to the values reported for agricultural streams in Illinois (74, 75) but lower than values published for agricultural drainage waters in Scotland, UK (76) and higher than values reported for other forested and agricultural streams (42,(76)(77)(78). N 2 O production is known to vary by land use, with higher production from denitrification in streams in agricultural and urban basins (41,76,79), and changes in community composition have been shown to influence denitrification rates in agricultural (80) and urban streams (21). However, Audet et al found no difference in N 2 O concentrations measured in forested and agricultural streams in Sweden (76).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The N 2 O concentrations measured in this study, at 0.22 to 4.41 g N 2 O liter Ϫ1 (58 to 1,217% saturated), were comparable to the values reported for agricultural streams in Illinois (74, 75) but lower than values published for agricultural drainage waters in Scotland, UK (76) and higher than values reported for other forested and agricultural streams (42,(76)(77)(78). N 2 O production is known to vary by land use, with higher production from denitrification in streams in agricultural and urban basins (41,76,79), and changes in community composition have been shown to influence denitrification rates in agricultural (80) and urban streams (21). However, Audet et al found no difference in N 2 O concentrations measured in forested and agricultural streams in Sweden (76).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, Audet et al found no difference in N 2 O concentrations measured in forested and agricultural streams in Sweden (76). Stream N 2 O concentrations are often correlated with dissolved nitrogen concentrations (41,76,79,81); however, variability in this relationship is often observed between sites (74, 75, 77). In this study, N 2 O concentrations were not correlated with microbial community compo-sition, but rather, N 2 O production was likely elevated in streams indirectly due to high rates of denitrification in response to NO 3…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spatially, urban (McMahon and Dennehy 1999; Beaulieu et al 2010; Beaulieu et al 2011) and agriculture (Beaulieu et al 2011; Audet et al 2017; Mwanake et al 2019) landcover types have been associated with high terrestrial nitrogen loading and subsequent high lotic N 2 O emissions. However, a recent study showed that forested rivers have similar N 2 O concentration as agriculture rivers (Audet et al 2020). Furthermore, within‐site N 2 O concentration and emission variability are difficult to predict.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore how representative the SBM catchment is for streams draining agricultural areas in the region, a snapshot sampling survey was performed across 10 streams (denoted region UPP 2 in the study by Audet et al (2019)) of various sizes (catchment area 8.5-740 km 2 ) and agricultural influence (30-86%) distributed within a radius of 10 km from the city center of Uppsala (Table S1).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%