IEEE International IEEE International IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2004. IGARSS '04. Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2004.1369826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest information from hyperspectral sensing

Abstract: Remote sensing of forests is a major application for Canada's new hyperspectral satellite (HERO). Hyperspectral remote sensing can provide forest information products for applications in forest inventory, forest chemistry, and for some Kyoto Protocol information products. Through several projects, we have demonstrated that airborne and satellite hyperspectral sensing can provide accurate maps of west coast forest species. High correlations have been demonstrated between ground measurements of foliar nitrogen a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The airborne hyperspectral image with lower spectral resolution (62 spectral bands of CASI against 116 of Resurs-P) and higher spatial resolution (1 m of CASI against 30 m of Resurs-P) yielded the best classification accuracies (CASI overall accuracy of 87% against Resurs-P overall accuracy of 67%). This confirms a recent study (Goodenough et al, 2004) showing that airborne hyperspectral data can be used in species classification with higher accuracy than satellite hyperspectral data. However, Townsend and Foster (2002) demonstrated the classification using satellite Hyperion data was superior to that using airborne AVIRIS data for pine and maple forest.…”
Section: Classification Of Tree Speciessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The airborne hyperspectral image with lower spectral resolution (62 spectral bands of CASI against 116 of Resurs-P) and higher spatial resolution (1 m of CASI against 30 m of Resurs-P) yielded the best classification accuracies (CASI overall accuracy of 87% against Resurs-P overall accuracy of 67%). This confirms a recent study (Goodenough et al, 2004) showing that airborne hyperspectral data can be used in species classification with higher accuracy than satellite hyperspectral data. However, Townsend and Foster (2002) demonstrated the classification using satellite Hyperion data was superior to that using airborne AVIRIS data for pine and maple forest.…”
Section: Classification Of Tree Speciessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Hyper-spectral or multi-spectral imaging techniques provide the means to extract additional information from the scene in a wide variety of applications, ranging from remote sensing [5,6] to biomedical imaging [7,8] to target recognition and tracking [9,10]. Hyper-spectral imaging suffers from a significant drawback in that the traditional approach to hyper-spectral imaging is not well suited for imaging motion.…”
Section: Application Of Periodic To Multi-spectral Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest biomass and carbon have been estimated employing both multi-sensor techniques [6] and AVIRIS data using partial least squares (PLS) regression [7]. Estimates of the chemical concentrations (chlorophyll, nitrogen, lignin, water content) of forest canopies can be made using hyperspectral data [8].…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%