2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00210-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest climatology: estimation and use of daily climatological data for Bavaria, Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods for handling missing data with daily resolution, on the other hand, are scarce and show marked errors, even though such methods perform well at lower resolution time * Correspondence to: M. Brunetti, ISAC-CNR, Via P. Gobetti,101, scales (e.g. DeGaetano et al, 1995;Xia et al, 2001). The situation becomes particularly complicated when dealing with precipitation, because of its large space and time variability; moreover, in this case, the problem is twofold, since both time location and rainfall amount of each single-day event must be reconstructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods for handling missing data with daily resolution, on the other hand, are scarce and show marked errors, even though such methods perform well at lower resolution time * Correspondence to: M. Brunetti, ISAC-CNR, Via P. Gobetti,101, scales (e.g. DeGaetano et al, 1995;Xia et al, 2001). The situation becomes particularly complicated when dealing with precipitation, because of its large space and time variability; moreover, in this case, the problem is twofold, since both time location and rainfall amount of each single-day event must be reconstructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, simplified schemes, including the so-called 'closest station method' and 'single best estimator' (e.g. Wallis et al, 1991;Eischeid et al, 2000;Xia et al, 2001), are also currently used for estimating missing values in precipitation series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods take into account the spatial variability, but they largely ignore the temporal information in long-time series. Some of the methods that follow this approach are the closest station (CS) method (Xia et al, 1999;Xia et al, 2001), the simple arithmetic averaging (SAA) method, the inverse distance method, the single best estimator (SBE) method, and the normal ratio (NR) method. The SAA method (Xia et al, 1999) fills in the missing value with the arithmetic mean of the synchronous values for five stations with similar characteristics and close to the target station.…”
Section: P Ramos-calzado Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely-used patching methods include: closest station, simple arithmetic averaging, inverse distance weighting, multiple regression and normal ratio (Tang et al, 1996;Makhuvha et al, 1997;Xia et al, 1999;Xia et al, 2001). In utilizing the closest station method, the nearest weather station with data corresponding to the period of concern is identified and missing values are either replaced directly by the value at the neighbour station or adjusted by a factor from the ratio of long-term means between the two stations (Xia et al, 2001). In simple arithmetic averaging, the missing data are obtained by arithmetically averaging data of the 2 to 5 closest weather stations around a station (Tang et al, 1996;Xia et al, 1999;De Silva et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%