2016
DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v42i3.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an inverse distance weighting method for patching daily and dekadal rainfall over the Free State Province, South Africa

Abstract: Climate data recorded by national meteorological agencies is either incomplete or faulty for some periods due to a number of reasons. Multi-functional utilization of climate data in complete form necessitates the filling of these gaps. In this study an inverse distance weighting (IDW) method was used to estimate rainfall utilizing neighbouring station data in the Free State Province of South Africa. Six weather stations evenly distributed across the province, and with data for 1950 to 2008, were used to evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Code Reference 1 Classical normal ratio method NR (Paulhus and Kohler, 1952) 2 Normal ratio method weighted with correlations NRWC (Young, 1992) 3 Inverse distance weighting method IDWM (Teegavarapu and Chandramouli, 2005;Chang et al, 2006;Moeletsi et al, 2016) 4 Weighted correlation coefficient method CCW (Suhaila et al, 2008;Ford and Quiring, 2014) 5 Modification to the weighted correlation coefficient method CCWM (Suhaila et al, 2008) 6 Normal ratio modified with inverse distance method NRIDW (Suhaila et al, 2008) 7 Modified correlation coefficient with inverse distance method CIDW (Suhaila et al, 2008) 8 Inverse distance weighting of normal ratio with correlation NRIDC (Azman et al, 2015) 9 Relation of the height with the weighted method of the inverse distance HIDW (Seyyednejad et al, 2012) related to the IDW method (d it ); however, although q=2 is the most commonly used value (Teegavarapu and Chandramouli, 2005;Boke, 2017) there is no theoretical justification for preferring this value over others (Bajjali, 2018). Therefore, other possible values for q should be investigated as well.…”
Section: # Impute Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Code Reference 1 Classical normal ratio method NR (Paulhus and Kohler, 1952) 2 Normal ratio method weighted with correlations NRWC (Young, 1992) 3 Inverse distance weighting method IDWM (Teegavarapu and Chandramouli, 2005;Chang et al, 2006;Moeletsi et al, 2016) 4 Weighted correlation coefficient method CCW (Suhaila et al, 2008;Ford and Quiring, 2014) 5 Modification to the weighted correlation coefficient method CCWM (Suhaila et al, 2008) 6 Normal ratio modified with inverse distance method NRIDW (Suhaila et al, 2008) 7 Modified correlation coefficient with inverse distance method CIDW (Suhaila et al, 2008) 8 Inverse distance weighting of normal ratio with correlation NRIDC (Azman et al, 2015) 9 Relation of the height with the weighted method of the inverse distance HIDW (Seyyednejad et al, 2012) related to the IDW method (d it ); however, although q=2 is the most commonly used value (Teegavarapu and Chandramouli, 2005;Boke, 2017) there is no theoretical justification for preferring this value over others (Bajjali, 2018). Therefore, other possible values for q should be investigated as well.…”
Section: # Impute Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Station data were not used in this study due to inconsistencies in recording rainfall data and gaps in the data (Moeletsi et al, 2016). Statistical analysis of the CRU grid data and weather station data was conducted (see Appendix).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical climate data contain gaps, which usually increase with the length of the dataset. The frequency of gaps in the climate data in most cases makes it difficult for the data users to make sound conclusions, since some of the important climatological events were not sufficiently covered by the records [10,11]. In some instances, there might have been faulty recordings, which further increase the uncertainty in the use of archived climate data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate data patching and infilling are common phrases used to fill and complete missing climate and hydrological data in a dataset [12,[15][16][17][18][19]. There are three common approaches that are often used to manage missing climate data: (a) use of continuous records and ignoring the prior events, (b) ignoring of gaps based on the assumption that the data is one continuous series of records [10] and (c) data infilling [11,20]. The main disadvantage of the first approach is that it wastes valuable and previous information and that true statistical inferences cannot be made, whereas the second approach will reduce the period of recorded events available for the analysis and these can over-or under-estimate the likelihood of occurrence of climatic events [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation