2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest aboveground biomass estimation in Zhejiang Province using the integration of Landsat TM and ALOS PALSAR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
88
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in agreement with the findings reported in References [94][95][96][97], which concluded that SVR consistently outperformed other machine learning methods. The performance (R 2 of 0.73 and RMSE of 38.68 Mg·ha −1 , Table 7) of the SVR model with the combination data of the Sentinel-2A and the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 indicates a satisfactory result compared to previous studies on the forest AGB, as seen in Reference [98] (R 2 = 0.46), (R 2 = 0.28-0.44) [21], and (R 2 = 0.46) [99].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is in agreement with the findings reported in References [94][95][96][97], which concluded that SVR consistently outperformed other machine learning methods. The performance (R 2 of 0.73 and RMSE of 38.68 Mg·ha −1 , Table 7) of the SVR model with the combination data of the Sentinel-2A and the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 indicates a satisfactory result compared to previous studies on the forest AGB, as seen in Reference [98] (R 2 = 0.46), (R 2 = 0.28-0.44) [21], and (R 2 = 0.46) [99].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This study addresses key issues by investigating the combination of remote sensing data of the Sentinel-2A and the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 for estimating the forest AGB. However, the combinations of optical images (i.e., Landsat) and SAR images (i.e., JERS-1 SAR) for the forest AGB estimation are not new [21]. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, investigating the combination of the Sentinel-2A and the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 for the estimation of forest ABG has seldom been carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Combining SAR and optical data has brought accurate AGB predictions in a number of cases because the structural SAR information can be complemented with canopy density, forest type, and foliage-related information collected by optical instruments. [32][33][34][35][36] Even with the increase in new data, fusion techniques, and innovative researches, AGB prediction based on SAR remains a challenging task, as saturation of the signal is common in forests, 37 where the backscatter is influenced by several factors, such as the soil moisture, especially when the vegetation coverage is low; 38 the forest type, the leaf presence with needleleaf forests possibly having the highest saturation level; 39 the seasonal and weather conditions; 40 the canopy roughness; 41 and the SAR signal polarization as well as the incidence angle. 42 Therefore, studies clarifying SAR response in different conditions and forests types are important, as they can support the effective exploitation of new SAR data streams into ecological research and monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the satellite remote sensing image used to estimate the carbon stocks were Landsat time series of medium resolution data with a spatial resolution of 30 × 30 m, and there were many disadvantages compared to the high-resolution satellite data used to estimate forest AGC [80]. Previous studies showed that the combination with multisource remote sensing data could effectively improve the estimation accuracy of AGC [81]. Remote sensing data were affected by their own spectral resolution, resulting in differences in the extraction accuracy of the band spectrum, vegetation index, texture information compared with high-resolution images [37,38,42,81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed that the combination with multisource remote sensing data could effectively improve the estimation accuracy of AGC [81]. Remote sensing data were affected by their own spectral resolution, resulting in differences in the extraction accuracy of the band spectrum, vegetation index, texture information compared with high-resolution images [37,38,42,81]. In addition, due to the large span of date and time acquisition of the eight scenes in the same period, although atmospheric correction was performed, radiation differences could not be completely eliminated, resulting in errors in bamboo forest information extraction [82].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%