Advances in Forensic Taphonomy 2001
DOI: 10.1201/9781420058352-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensics, Archaeology, and Taphonomy: The Symbiotic Relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schmidt and Symes’ (2015) volume on burned human bone offered commingling‐related methods for fire‐modified remains such as the Bab adh‐Dhra’ EB II–III collection, discussing bone and tooth color changes (Beach, Passalacqua, & Chapman, ; Devlin & Herrmann, ; Ullinger & Sheridan, ), thermal breakdown of bone (DeHaan, ; Schurr, Hayes, & Cook, ; Thompson, ), enamel changes (Mahoney & Miszkiewicz, ; Sandholzer, ; Schmidt, ), and site‐specific reconstructions (Curtin, ; McKinley, ; Schmidt et al, ; Wahl, ). Haglund and Sorg's older edited volumes (1997, 2002) provided several taphonomic considerations for studies of commingling (Correia, ; Darwent & Lyman, ; Galloway, ; Haglund, Connor, & Scott, ; Lyman & Fox, ; Roksandic, ; Saul and Saul, ; Ubelaker, ).…”
Section: Commingling Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schmidt and Symes’ (2015) volume on burned human bone offered commingling‐related methods for fire‐modified remains such as the Bab adh‐Dhra’ EB II–III collection, discussing bone and tooth color changes (Beach, Passalacqua, & Chapman, ; Devlin & Herrmann, ; Ullinger & Sheridan, ), thermal breakdown of bone (DeHaan, ; Schurr, Hayes, & Cook, ; Thompson, ), enamel changes (Mahoney & Miszkiewicz, ; Sandholzer, ; Schmidt, ), and site‐specific reconstructions (Curtin, ; McKinley, ; Schmidt et al, ; Wahl, ). Haglund and Sorg's older edited volumes (1997, 2002) provided several taphonomic considerations for studies of commingling (Correia, ; Darwent & Lyman, ; Galloway, ; Haglund, Connor, & Scott, ; Lyman & Fox, ; Roksandic, ; Saul and Saul, ; Ubelaker, ).…”
Section: Commingling Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taphonomic analyses performed at the laboratory required very specific field data collected with those analyses in mind. In this manner, the new forensic taphonomy volumes included several chapters on forensic archaeology and scene recovery techniques (Dirkmaat 2002;Dirkmaat and Adovasio 1997;Hochrein 2002;Mayne Correia and Beattie 2002;Saul and Saul 2002;Scott and Connor 1997).…”
Section: Taphonomic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forensic anthropologist, in their role as an expert in human skeletal remains [e.g. see 7,8], can provide valuable assistance at the scene in identifying the presence of bone fragments in various conditions that may otherwise be unrecognisable to the untrained eye, and distinguishing between human and non-human bone [5,9,10]. Once in the mortuary setting, the forensic anthropologist may work in tandem with the forensic pathologist and forensic odontologist, amongst other specialists both medical and legal, in order to estimate age, sex, stature, and ancestry, and examine unique identifying features that may aid in the identification of the deceased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%