Forensic Archaeology 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118745977.ch31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic archaeology in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indoor scene processing protocols do not cover all natural taphonomic agents and are generally ineffective and incomplete for dealing with the outdoor scene. Thus, we must turn to other disciplines, and in fact one is ready-made: forensic archaeology, by which standard archaeological principles, practices and methods (with some minor modifications, see below), is employed to systematically and comprehensively locate, document and interpret evidence at the outdoor forensic scene (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Indoor scene processing protocols do not cover all natural taphonomic agents and are generally ineffective and incomplete for dealing with the outdoor scene. Thus, we must turn to other disciplines, and in fact one is ready-made: forensic archaeology, by which standard archaeological principles, practices and methods (with some minor modifications, see below), is employed to systematically and comprehensively locate, document and interpret evidence at the outdoor forensic scene (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common questions asked of the indoor scene could thus not be addressed at the outdoor scene, as the evidence for the construction of the scientific hypotheses had not been collected. The most effective tool for evidence collection of the outdoor scene was clearly archaeology (1, 4, 7–9). This was evident simply by comparing the coincidental primary goals of both disciplines: reconstruction of the past based on evidence found in highly altered contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations