2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic genealogy, bioethics and the Golden State Killer case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Profiles and other data in forensic STR databases are managed and maintained by government agencies under strict privacy protections [89] and policies regarding the sharing of that data with authorized agencies. Some propose that these searching approaches each bring varying degrees of additional privacy and intrusion concerns [29,75,77,90]. It has been suggested that government databases were not intended for these kinship type familial and Y‐STR database searches [91] as is done with familial searching and the Y‐STR database search concepts.…”
Section: Privacy Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Profiles and other data in forensic STR databases are managed and maintained by government agencies under strict privacy protections [89] and policies regarding the sharing of that data with authorized agencies. Some propose that these searching approaches each bring varying degrees of additional privacy and intrusion concerns [29,75,77,90]. It has been suggested that government databases were not intended for these kinship type familial and Y‐STR database searches [91] as is done with familial searching and the Y‐STR database search concepts.…”
Section: Privacy Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IGG exploits high-density SNP profiles, generated either by microarray (e.g., ~850 000 or more SNPs) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) (e.g., millions of SNPs) technologies. A SNP profile is searched against a privately or publicly available high-density SNP profile database(s) for potential relatives in the database using measures such as the total length of the shared DNA segments between a pair of profiles [2,6,[29][30][31][32]. IGG methods are able to determine 3 rd degree or greater relationships with reasonable accuracies well beyond current A-STR based methods.…”
Section: Inve S Ti G Ative G Ene Tic G Ene Alogy (I G G)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the application of IGG has been shown to be successful, critical concerns have been raised regarding its use for law enforcement purposes. These opinions include issues related to ethical and legal aspects [24][25][26][27] and the future use of IGG in the forensic field will therefore not only involve technical challenges. The US Department of Justices (DOJ) published an interim policy in September 2019 in which they, at a general level, described when and how IGG should be used, its limitations, how data should be administrated etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-range familial searches in recreational DNA databases have been the subject of intense interest since the high-profile case of the Golden State Killer 1 , whose main suspect was identified by a long-range familial search in 2018 2 . This technique has raised considerable media attention and has sparked immediate criticism from forensic geneticists and other professionals, regulators, policy advisors, and ethicists (Arnold 2020;Berkman, Miller, and Grady 2018;Biometrics and Forensics Ethics Group 2020;Curtis et al 2018;Kennett 2019;Murphy 2018;Phillips 2018;Syndercombe-Court 2018;Wickenheiser 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%