2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3321620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign Institutional Ownership and Liquidity: Evidence from Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
1
11

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
37
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutional ownership did not affect on PBV, so hypothesis 11 was rejected. This finding supported Shahid (2003), but it was in contrary to research conducted by Arouri et al (2014) and Thanatawee (2014), who proved that institutional ownership had positive effect on the firm value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Institutional ownership did not affect on PBV, so hypothesis 11 was rejected. This finding supported Shahid (2003), but it was in contrary to research conducted by Arouri et al (2014) and Thanatawee (2014), who proved that institutional ownership had positive effect on the firm value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Arouri et al (2014) proves a positive relationship between institutional ownership and bank performance. Thanatawee (2014) proves institutional investors provide oversight role effectively, thereby improving corporate governance and firm value. Belkhir (2009) proves there is a positive relationship between board size and firm perfor-mance due to the board size identical to the firm size.…”
Section: Effect Of Institutional Ownership Board Independent and Boamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside investors (institutions) will mitigate agency problems through their strengths and supervision (Susilowati, Puspitasari, & Yuseno, 2017), so it will make management to work by improving company performance through strategic decisions namely intellectual capital. Furthermore, previous researches conducted by Ruiz-mallorquí & Santana-martín (2011), Thanatawee (2014, Abukosim, Mukhtaruddin, Ferina, & Nurcahaya (2014) and Chen, Blenman, & Chen (2014) also found a significant positive effect between the structure of institutional ownership and company performance. Therefore, the relations between institution ownership structure as the moderating variable and the influence of intellectual capital towards company value is that the institution as the owner will work based on company's objectives, so they will use strategy that can escalate company value, one of it is by using intellectual capital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, institutional investors are considered to have the power to influence board decisions, reduce oversight costs, engage in active ownership so that their presence affects the company's performance (Shleifer andVishny, 1997 in Alfaraih, et.al, 2012). According to Thanatawee (2014), along with the high agency problem, institutional investors act more actively in supervision of management performance which will increase the company's value. Viewed from the perspective of agency theory, institutional ownership that is a big shareholder tends to be alert to agency problems, because with large investments they will more closely supervise the actions of management.…”
Section: H1: the Board Of Directors Has A Positive Effect Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%