Foreign Body Reaction Associated with PET and PET/Chitosan Electrospun Nanofibrous Abdominal Meshes

Abstract

Electrospun materials have been widely explored for biomedical applications because of their advantageous characteristics, i.e., tridimensional nanofibrous structure with high surface-to-volume ratio, high porosity, and pore interconnectivity. Furthermore, considering the similarities between the nanofiber networks and the extracellular matrix (ECM), as well as the accepted role of changes in ECM for hernia repair, electrospun polymer fiber assemblies have emerged as potential materials for incisional hernia repair. In this work, we describe the application of electrospun non-absorbable mats based on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) in the repair of abdominal defects, comparing the performance of these meshes with that of a commercial polypropylene mesh and a multifilament PET mesh. PET and PET/chitosan electrospun meshes revealed good performance during incisional hernia surgery, post-operative period, and no evidence of intestinal adhesion was found. The electrospun meshes were flexible with high suture retention, showing tensile strengths of 3 MPa and breaking strains of 8–33%. Nevertheless, a significant foreign body reaction (FBR) was observed in animals treated with the nanofibrous materials. Animals implanted with PET and PET/chitosan electrospun meshes (fiber diameter of 0.71±0.28 µm and 3.01±0.72 µm, respectively) showed, respectively, foreign body granuloma formation, averaging 4.2-fold and 7.4-fold greater than the control commercial mesh group (Marlex). Many foreign body giant cells (FBGC) involving nanofiber pieces were also found in the PET and PET/chitosan groups (11.9 and 19.3 times more FBGC than control, respectively). In contrast, no important FBR was observed for PET microfibers (fiber diameter = 18.9±0.21 µm). Therefore, we suggest that the reduced dimension and the high surface-to-volume ratio of the electrospun fibers caused the FBR reaction, pointing out the need for further studies to elucidate the mechanisms underlying interactions between cells/tissues and nanofibrous materials in order to gain a better understanding of the implantation risks associated with nanostructured biomaterials.

In silico approaches for enhancing retrieval analysis as a source for discovery of implant reactivity‐related mechanisms and biomarkers

“…A novel multilayered coating with chitosan and diclofenac was introduced as potential application for improving longevity of stainless steel hip replacements . Hence, defining the CD68‐related mechanisms under which chitin and chitosan trigger or fail to trigger immunogenic and proinflammatory responses can be beneficial for the translational relevance of chitosan involving various potential applications pertinent to devices, vaccines, drug and gene delivery, and tissue engineering …”

Biomimetic implants for pelvic floor repair

“…Studies in different animals show that synthetic or semi‐synthetic electrospun matrices provoke a host reaction that induces cells to deposit new matrix . Electrospun PLA and PLA/Gelatin showed great biocompatibility in a subcutaneous rat model with no signs of toxicity or inflammation up to 8 weeks of implantation .…”

Fibre laser joining of highly dissimilar materials: Commercially pure Ti and PET hybrid joint for medical device applications

“…Pure Ti is one of the most common biomaterials as it has excellent biocompatibility which does not promote any adverse reactions and is tolerated well by the human tissues [18]. PET is a highly biocompatible, biostable, and nondegradable polymer which possesses desirable mechanical features for biomaterial applications [19]. Further, PET is known to have very high transparency (~90%) to the laser in the nearinfrared region [11,14], which is a crucial property determining the amount of laser energy input to the metal substrate.…”