2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting the good and bad uncertainties of crude oil prices using a HAR framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The earlier studies of Haugom et al (2014) , Sévi (2014) , Prokopczuk et al (2015) have led to the conclusion that all models fail to beat the forecast accuracy of the simple HAR-RV model which utilizes only the information embedded in past realized volatility, while incorporating structural breaks to the model is found to help improve the predictive performance ( Wen et al, 2016 ). Moreover, Gong and Lin (2017) indicate signed jumps contain forecasting information for good and bad RVs, derived from positive and negative oil returns respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 The earlier studies of Haugom et al (2014) , Sévi (2014) , Prokopczuk et al (2015) have led to the conclusion that all models fail to beat the forecast accuracy of the simple HAR-RV model which utilizes only the information embedded in past realized volatility, while incorporating structural breaks to the model is found to help improve the predictive performance ( Wen et al, 2016 ). Moreover, Gong and Lin (2017) indicate signed jumps contain forecasting information for good and bad RVs, derived from positive and negative oil returns respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To some extent, under the same theme, the role of various metrics capturing financial and oil market uncertainty and sentiment, has been stressed by numerous other studies including Gong and Lin (2018a) , Wen et al (2019) , Yang et al (2019) , and Bonato et al (2020) . Gong and Lin (2017) and Wen et al (2016) . At the same time, Liu et al (2018) and Chen et al (2019) argue that the benchmark HAR-RV model can be outperformed when considering the time-variation and asymmetric volatility jumps and co-jumps with the equity (S&P 500) market.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And, more remarkably, the coefficients of GDP and its spatially lagged term in this model are negative. This may be attributable to the negative effect of GDP, which in fact it is quite common when using econometric models for empirical analysis (Wen et al, 2018[ 47 ]; Dai and Wen, 2018[ 48 ]; Gong and Lin, 2017[ 49 ])…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naser found that using the dynamic model averaging (DMA) with empirical evidence is better than linear models such as autoregressive (AR) model and its variants [5]. Gong and Lin proposed several new 2 Complexity heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models to forecast the good and bad uncertainties in crude oil prices [6]. Wen et al also used HAR models with structural breaks to forecast the volatility of crude oil futures [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%