Forecasting radiation fog at climatologically contrasting sites: evaluation of statistical methods and WRF

Abstract

A six‐year climatology of radiation fog has been compiled at two sites: the Research Centre for the Lower Atmosphere (CIBA, Spain) and the Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research (CESAR, The Netherlands). These sites are contrasted in terms of geographical situation, climate zone, altitude, humidity and soil water availability. Therefore, several climatological differences in fog abundance, onset, dissipation and duration have been quantified between the two sites. The more humid site (CESAR) is characterised by relatively short radiation fog events distributed throughout the year. However, radiation fog at the drier site (CIBA) is more persistent and appears during late autumn/winter months. In general, its formation requires more time after sunset (∼2 h more), since further cooling is required to reach saturation. The forecast of these fog events has been evaluated through two different approaches. First, we extend the statistical method presented by Menut et al. (2014) (M14). This method uses statistics to define threshold values on key variables for fog formation (pre‐fog) and verifies its predictability using observations and numerical model output. We present some of the most appropriate threshold values for the forecasting of pre‐fog periods at both sites, which differ from those presented in M14 and depend on the optimisation of the hit rate or the false‐alarm rate. Additionally, we also extend M14 by suggesting other variables as potential predictors for fog formation (friction velocity and visibility tendency). Finally, we focus on fog simulation by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in terms of liquid water content. The WRF model was able to simulate radiation fog when configured with sophisticated physical options and high resolution. However it failed in simulating the onset, dissipation and the vertical extent of fog (which was overestimated). The model results were extremely sensitive to the spin‐up time.

Regime Transitions in Near-Surface Temperature Inversions: A Conceptual Model

“…Reliable forecasts are therefore essential in order to take timely and adequate road management measures. Strong temperature inversions also promote the occurrence of fog events (Roman-Cascon et al 2016), which impact on traffic safety through reduced visibility. In aviation, this will translate in reduced flight activity, which causes significant economic losses (Stolaki et al 2012).…”

A mixture of experts model for predicting persistent weather patterns

“…This airport is well-known for its foggy days. Due to its geographical and climatological characteristics, radiation fog is very frequent [13]. A detailed Valladolid airport climatology can be found in [14].…”

Direct Numerical Simulation of Fog: The Sensitivity of a Dissipation Phase to Environmental Conditions

“…The dissipation phase is characterized by an increase in the spatial variability of the fog liquid water [11]. Current numerical weather prediction models still exhibit relatively low capacity for forecasting fog life cycles accurately [12][13][14]. One of the key challenges in fog forecasting and nowcasting models is an accurate prediction of dissipation budget analysis of stratocumulus cloud thinning [39] and extend it to study controlling parameters affecting fog depletion.…”