2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting consumer perception of innovativeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variables do not load onto one general factor and the first factor accounts for approximately 36% of the total variance, which despite the limitations of Harman's one-factor test (Podsakoff et al, 2003), suggest no reason to suspect significant CMV. Following recent studies (Bstieler and Hemmert, 2015;Fernandez et al, 2010;Lowe and Alpert, 2015) we also conduct the marker variable technique to consider the potential influence of CMV (Podsakoff et al, 2012). We use foreign group (firms being a member of a foreign enterprise group) as the marker variable, which we do not believe theoretically relates to our dependent variables and possesses the lowest correlation (Lindell and Whitney, 2001).…”
Section: Common Methods Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables do not load onto one general factor and the first factor accounts for approximately 36% of the total variance, which despite the limitations of Harman's one-factor test (Podsakoff et al, 2003), suggest no reason to suspect significant CMV. Following recent studies (Bstieler and Hemmert, 2015;Fernandez et al, 2010;Lowe and Alpert, 2015) we also conduct the marker variable technique to consider the potential influence of CMV (Podsakoff et al, 2012). We use foreign group (firms being a member of a foreign enterprise group) as the marker variable, which we do not believe theoretically relates to our dependent variables and possesses the lowest correlation (Lindell and Whitney, 2001).…”
Section: Common Methods Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overby and Lee (2006) argue that the utilitarian value is the consumer's assessment of the cost and substantial advantages of products, services and prices after considering their characteristics [23]. Lowe and Alpert (2015) point out that the consumers' product perceptions, such as concepts, technological novelty and comparative advantages, all affect their hedonic and utilitarian values [24]. Overby and Lee (2006) point out that consumers mostly consider rational factors, i.e., judgment of economic benefits in terms of money, convenience and time cost [23].…”
Section: Utilitarian Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Lowe and Alpert [48] explained innovativeness as the superiority in new product development research, which consists of the perceived newness and perceived relative advantage of a product. The authors also emphasize that understanding consumers' perceptions of innovativeness helps to explain and predict unexpected consumer responses.…”
Section: Technology Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extrinsic motivations concern utilitarian attitudes, while intrinsic motivations are hedonic attitudes, such as perceived enjoyment [53]. Products that are presumed to provide high functional benefits lead to utilitarian attitudes, while products with high perceived newness lead to hedonic attitudes [48]. Recent research has shown that consumers are affected by an initial emotional response when they are exposed to innovation [54,55], especially within the information and communications technologies (ICT) field.…”
Section: Product Stagementioning
confidence: 99%