2010
DOI: 10.2331/suisan.76.670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecast of the first ascending day and number of ascending ayu Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis in rivers flowing into Lake Biwa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at least in the present case, the statistics can be regarded as those based on a large sample size because the population size in each river was sufficiently large (at least hundreds or thousands individuals; cf. Sakai, 2010Sakai, , 2011 and eDNA could have captured haplotypes from the whole population. Also, a simulation analysis by scaling down the sample size of each to 2000, 1000, and 500 confirmed that the F ST values were still significant in most cases even for the smallest F ST between spring and autumn migrants (7-CN; Table S7).…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at least in the present case, the statistics can be regarded as those based on a large sample size because the population size in each river was sufficiently large (at least hundreds or thousands individuals; cf. Sakai, 2010Sakai, , 2011 and eDNA could have captured haplotypes from the whole population. Also, a simulation analysis by scaling down the sample size of each to 2000, 1000, and 500 confirmed that the F ST values were still significant in most cases even for the smallest F ST between spring and autumn migrants (7-CN; Table S7).…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at least in the present case, the statistics can be regarded as those based on a large sample size because the population size in each river was sufficiently large (at least hundreds or thousands individuals; cf. Sakai, 2010Sakai, , 2011 and eDNA could have captured haplotypes from the whole population. Also, a simulation analysis by scaling down the sample size of each to 2000, 1000 and 500 confirmed that the FST values were still significant in most cases even for the smallest FST between spring and autumn migrants (7-CN; Table S6).…”
Section: The Genetic Differences Between the Two Migrant Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%