2019
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwz110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force of Infection and True Infection Rate of Dengue in Singapore: Implications for Dengue Control and Management

Abstract: National data on dengue notifications do not capture all dengue infections and do not reflect the true intensity of disease transmission. To assess the true dengue infection rate and disease control efforts in Singapore, we conducted age-stratified serosurveys among residents after a 2013 outbreak that was the largest dengue outbreak on record. The age-weighted prevalence of dengue immunoglobulin G among residents was 49.8% (95% confidence interval: 48.4, 51.1) in 2013 and 48.6% (95% confidence interval: 47.0,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The considerable increase in the relative proportion of 36-55 years-old with DENV1 antibody titres from 2009 to 2013 is consistent and indicative of the occurrence of a DENV1 epidemic in 2013 [17]. The fact that DENV1 seroprevalence is high among older age-classes in 2013 is line with the relatively low force of infection of DENV1 in Singapore compared to other transmission settings and with the declining transmission intensity observed over the years and with population aging [20]. Similarly, the 10% increase in the proportion of the youngest age groups in cluster 1 between 2009 and 2013 (from 23 to 26.5%) is also indicative of the occurrence of a DENV2 epidemic between 2009 and 2013.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The considerable increase in the relative proportion of 36-55 years-old with DENV1 antibody titres from 2009 to 2013 is consistent and indicative of the occurrence of a DENV1 epidemic in 2013 [17]. The fact that DENV1 seroprevalence is high among older age-classes in 2013 is line with the relatively low force of infection of DENV1 in Singapore compared to other transmission settings and with the declining transmission intensity observed over the years and with population aging [20]. Similarly, the 10% increase in the proportion of the youngest age groups in cluster 1 between 2009 and 2013 (from 23 to 26.5%) is also indicative of the occurrence of a DENV2 epidemic between 2009 and 2013.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In 2019, Singapore also experienced a large dengue outbreak with more than 16,000 cases [27]. There is low herd immunity, particularly among younger generations, due to decades of low dengue transmission [28][29][30]. The primary dengue vector is A. aegypti, and although Aedes albopictus is also present, it is considered a weak secondary vector [31].…”
Section: The Singapore Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entomological indices and dengue case numbers are not reliable measures for assessing the long-term impact of vector control programmes because of changes in surveillance and diagnostic capabilities over time [30]. Instead, NEA uses blood bank IgG seroprevalence to estimate the force of infection (FOI) over time [30].…”
Section: Vector Surveillance and Monitoring And Evaluation Of Intervementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Primarily, vector control is used to mitigate dengue transmissions in Singapore and its success is evidenced in the decreasing seroprevalence nationally for the past two decades [ 3 5 ]. However, this low seroprevalence complicates the implementation of vaccination using the tetravalent Dengvaxia (CYD-TDV) [ 6 , 7 ] vaccine on the national scale [ 8 ] due to potentially longer-term risks of severe dengue in vaccinated but seronegative individuals [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%