1971
DOI: 10.2307/1378930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging Behavior in Fishing Bats and Their Insectivorous Relatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since food passage time through the digestive tract of insectivorous bats is known to be rapid (Buchler 1975), the remains from a different foraging area can appear in the bats' feces only on the first day after arriving at a different area. Novick and Dale (1971) compared between the skills of the fishing bats N. leporinus and M. vivesi and the trawling bats of the subgenus Leuconoe, all of which have large specialized feet, long fingers and similar foraging behavior. In their note Novick and Dale (1971) consider these features to be an adaptation for catching insects with their feet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since food passage time through the digestive tract of insectivorous bats is known to be rapid (Buchler 1975), the remains from a different foraging area can appear in the bats' feces only on the first day after arriving at a different area. Novick and Dale (1971) compared between the skills of the fishing bats N. leporinus and M. vivesi and the trawling bats of the subgenus Leuconoe, all of which have large specialized feet, long fingers and similar foraging behavior. In their note Novick and Dale (1971) consider these features to be an adaptation for catching insects with their feet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish-eating species share a set of morphological, functional and behavioural features with trawling insectivorous bats: both groups have large feet and long fingers armed with well developed claws, suited for capturing prey from the water surface (Brosset and Delamare Deboutteville, 1966;Brosset, 1975;Jones and Rayner, 1988), and both share relatively large and pointed wings, with high aspect ratio, fitted to allow relatively slow flight in open environments (Norberg and Rayner, 1987). Consequently, several authors have suggested a close link between trawling insectivory and piscivory, considering the former as a possible preadaptation for the latter (e.g., Novick and Dale, 1971;Jones and Rayner, 1988;Kalko et al, 1998). A recently published research on the molecular taxonomy of genus Myotis revealed that the subgenus Leuconoe (Findley, 1972), which includes all trawling myotid species, is paraphyletic, and consequently constitutes an ecomorph that has evolved independently several times (Ruedi and Mayer, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst the few piscivorous species, such as Myotis vivesi Menegaux, 1901(BLOOD & CLARK 1998, Noctilio leporinus (Linnaeus, 1758) is one of those best adapted to fish eating (NOVICK & DALE 1971, BROOKE 1994. Known such great bulldog bat or fishing bat, N. leporinus is the greater bat of family Noctilionidae, wich includes the lesser buldog bat Noctilio albiventris Desmarest, 1818.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%