LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3448139.3448144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Footprints at School: Modelling In-class Social Dynamics from Students’ Physical Positioning Traces

Abstract: Schools are increasingly becoming into complex learning spaces where students interact with various physical and digital resources, educators, and peers. Although the field of learning analytics has advanced in analysing logs captured from digital tools, less progress has been made in understanding the social dynamics that unfold in physical learning spaces. Among the various rapidly emerging sensing technologies, position tracking may hold promises to reveal salient aspects of activities in physical learning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To model this, a four‐step extraction process was performed: Interpersonal distances among all students were extracted by calculating the Euclidean distances between each tag. This step involved calculating all possible pair combinations for each second. A potential instance of social interaction was identified if two or more tags were within one‐meter proximity of each other for more than ten consecutive seconds, as modelled in previous works (Chng et al., 2020; Martinez‐Maldonado, Schulte, et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2021). This ten‐second constraint minimises the false identification of unintended collocation, for example, when teachers are walking around during supervision or two students are passing by each other (Greenberg et al., 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To model this, a four‐step extraction process was performed: Interpersonal distances among all students were extracted by calculating the Euclidean distances between each tag. This step involved calculating all possible pair combinations for each second. A potential instance of social interaction was identified if two or more tags were within one‐meter proximity of each other for more than ten consecutive seconds, as modelled in previous works (Chng et al., 2020; Martinez‐Maldonado, Schulte, et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2021). This ten‐second constraint minimises the false identification of unintended collocation, for example, when teachers are walking around during supervision or two students are passing by each other (Greenberg et al., 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Yan et al. (2021) also used wearable trackers in the form of wristbands to capture individual social interactions and group social dynamics in large learning spaces, but their discussion limited to model behaviours for descriptive purposes using unsupervised techniques.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Close contacts were identified using a proximity-based identification method relying on the Euclidean distances between two participants [39,40]. Two different criteria items were used, both adapted from the guidelines of the Department of Health and Human Services in Victoria [41], which have also been applied in a recent COVID-19 study with Australian children [8].…”
Section: Close Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, novel methods allow for collecting learners' physiological states and behaviours (e.g. heart, brain, skin) (Larmuseau et al, 2020), or capturing social proximity (Yan et al, 2021) and environmental conditions (e.g. location, noise) (Crescenzi-Lanna, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%