The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2010
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foot contact surface effect to the metatarsals loading character during inversion landing

Abstract: SUMMARYThe present study reports the development of a detailed three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) foot model for investigating the effect of the material properties and thicknesses of the landing mat on stress distribution and concentration point within the metatarsals during landing at an inversion position. Foam material mat insert between the foot and ground with different thicknesses had been systematic studied. The predicted plantar pressure distribution showed a good agreement with the experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(55 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poisson's ratio=0.3) [23]. As in previous works [11] and other literatures [24], the stiffness of the Cartilage, Plantar Fascia and Ligament is set at 1, 350 and 250 MPa, respectively; the Poisson's ratio is set as 0.4. The phalanges are assumed to have the same material properties as the bones [16].…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Poisson's ratio=0.3) [23]. As in previous works [11] and other literatures [24], the stiffness of the Cartilage, Plantar Fascia and Ligament is set at 1, 350 and 250 MPa, respectively; the Poisson's ratio is set as 0.4. The phalanges are assumed to have the same material properties as the bones [16].…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients of the hyperelastic material used for the encapsulated soft tissue is C10=0.08556, C01=-0.0841, C11=-0.02319, C02=0.00851, D1 = 3.65273, D2=0. [11,25]. The data was obtained through an in vivo compression measurement with several cohorts and inverse parameter fitting, the model had been used in serval published biomechanical works [11,12,13].…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations