2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter identification of hyperelastic material properties of the heel pad based on an analytical contact mechanics model of a spherical indentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cartilage is often modeled as a thin cartilaginous layer of 1.0–1.5 mm thickness on the articular surfaces ( Shepherd and Seedhom, 1999 ), but here the bone elements corresponding to articular surfaces were manually selected and assigned as articular cartilage, and the Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and density were set to 10 MPa, 0.4, and 0.002 g/mm 3 , respectively, based on previous studies ( Gefen, 2003 ; Qian et al, 2013 ). The encapsulated soft tissue was defined as a hyperelastic Ogden material, whose strain energy potential function U can be expressed as where λ is the deviatoric principal stretch; C and α are coefficients, whose values were determined to be 0.0102 MPa and 8.04, respectively, based on in vivo parameter identification using a spherical indentation and an analytical contact mechanics model ( Suzuki et al, 2017 ). The density was determined to be 0.937 × 10 −3 g/mm 3 ( Qian et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cartilage is often modeled as a thin cartilaginous layer of 1.0–1.5 mm thickness on the articular surfaces ( Shepherd and Seedhom, 1999 ), but here the bone elements corresponding to articular surfaces were manually selected and assigned as articular cartilage, and the Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and density were set to 10 MPa, 0.4, and 0.002 g/mm 3 , respectively, based on previous studies ( Gefen, 2003 ; Qian et al, 2013 ). The encapsulated soft tissue was defined as a hyperelastic Ogden material, whose strain energy potential function U can be expressed as where λ is the deviatoric principal stretch; C and α are coefficients, whose values were determined to be 0.0102 MPa and 8.04, respectively, based on in vivo parameter identification using a spherical indentation and an analytical contact mechanics model ( Suzuki et al, 2017 ). The density was determined to be 0.937 × 10 −3 g/mm 3 ( Qian et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where λ is the deviatoric principal stretch; C and α are coefficients, whose values were determined to be 0.0102 MPa and 8.04, respectively, based on in vivo parameter identification using a spherical indentation and an analytical contact mechanics model (Suzuki et al, 2017). The density was determined to be 0.937 × 10 −3 g/mm 3 (Qian et al, 2013).…”
Section: Human Foot Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the indentation tests, a 3-mm diameter cylindrical flat-ended indenter tip was used [ 54 , 55 ]. The tests were conducted at two different frequencies 0.2Hz and 20Hz to 50% of the participant’s soft tissue thickness in order to identify the viscoelastic properties of the tissue [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomechanical properties of the heel pad have been characterized in the relevant literature, and it was found that the heel pad exhibited hyperelastic mechanical characteristics during compression and that materials with this mechanical characteristic undergo a large deformation under compressive loading (Miller-Young et al, 2002;Grigoriadis et al, 2017), allowing the foot to decelerate over a certain distance and achieve effective cushioning. The stress relaxation and creep of the heel pad reflect the viscoelastic material properties (Behforootan et al, 2017;Suzuki et al, 2017;Tecse et al, 2023). Under viscous action, the impact energy absorbed by the heel pad is dissipated in the form of viscoelastic creep and heat (De Clercq et al, 1994), and the energy dissipated by the heel pad can reach approximately 35% during compression (Ledoux and Blevins, 2007), this is important for cushioning performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%