1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00208524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
233
0
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 410 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
233
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In some languages, the minimal word is relatively large, a fact which has proved important in current developments in phonology (see, e.g., McCarthy & Prince, 1990); for instance Ito (1986Ito ( , 1990 has argued that the minimal word in Japanese is bimoraic (containing two morae, i.e., con sisting minimally of a heavy syllable or two light syllables), while the Austra lian language Lardil has a bisyllabic minimal word. However, in nearly all languages it is the case that a single consonant cannot form a lexical word.…”
Section: Ruling Out Impossible Segmentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some languages, the minimal word is relatively large, a fact which has proved important in current developments in phonology (see, e.g., McCarthy & Prince, 1990); for instance Ito (1986Ito ( , 1990 has argued that the minimal word in Japanese is bimoraic (containing two morae, i.e., con sisting minimally of a heavy syllable or two light syllables), while the Austra lian language Lardil has a bisyllabic minimal word. However, in nearly all languages it is the case that a single consonant cannot form a lexical word.…”
Section: Ruling Out Impossible Segmentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work was funded in part by a standard SSHRC research grant 410-2005-1175. than that implied by the facts above. In particular, we argue that these patterns submit to an analysis in which the shape of the reduplicant is a minimal word (McCarthy & Prince 1986, McCarthy & Prince 1994a: it is large enough to support a well-formed foot but also minimal in that only one foot is typically allowed. This analysis is guided by the assumptions of Generalized Template Theory (McCarthy & Prince 1994a, 1994b, according to which template form is predicted as the satisfaction of independently motivated well-formedness constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A minimal word (MinWd) is a prosodic word that satisfies canonical requirements on word shape, like foot binarity, but is also minimal in that it contains a single prosodic foot (McCarthy & Prince 1986. It is not a new prosodic category, but a prosodic word shaped by principles of prosodic organization, chiefly the principles that underlie the prosodic hierarchy (Nespor & Vogel 1986, Selkirk 1980) and foot binarity (Kager 1989, Prince 1980.…”
Section: Minimal Word Phonology and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations