2022
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food System Resilience: Concepts, Issues, and Challenges

Abstract: Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on food system and resilience concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (Resilience of what? Resilience to what? Resilience from whose perspective? Resilience for how long?) and three approaches to enhancing resilience (robustness, recovery, and reorientation—the three “Rs”). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The panel members identified critical challenges and points of tension relating to the definition of rural community resilience, both from practical and theoretical perspectives. In particular, the panel members’ contributions echoed existing research that has found that community resilience as a concept lacks a clear, agreed upon and cohesive definition, with different types of stakeholders defining and perceiving the concept in different ways (see Zurek et al., 2022, for a review of definitions used by different academic and practitioner communities). While ‘emergency’ interpretations of community resilience are reflected in the resilience rhetoric in current Scottish Government policy, panel members preferred to note the importance of ‘everyday’ resilience, whereby communities have the ability to respond to gradual change over longer timescales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The panel members identified critical challenges and points of tension relating to the definition of rural community resilience, both from practical and theoretical perspectives. In particular, the panel members’ contributions echoed existing research that has found that community resilience as a concept lacks a clear, agreed upon and cohesive definition, with different types of stakeholders defining and perceiving the concept in different ways (see Zurek et al., 2022, for a review of definitions used by different academic and practitioner communities). While ‘emergency’ interpretations of community resilience are reflected in the resilience rhetoric in current Scottish Government policy, panel members preferred to note the importance of ‘everyday’ resilience, whereby communities have the ability to respond to gradual change over longer timescales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This may be particularly challenging for evaluating resilience as a form of reorientation or transformation as proposed by Zurek et al. (2022). When communities make more radical changes in response to change, for example, transitioning from retail to service‐ and community‐oriented offerings in town centres or transforming a local economy from manufacturing to tourism, there will always be winners and losers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Food systems appeared increasingly vulnerable to the strong interconnections among operators along the food chain. This was seen in the dominance of a small set of retailers, the reliance on just-in-time supply chains, and a dependence on imported food ( Zurek et al, 2022 ). Stringent lockdown measures fuelled short-term food shortages and caused supply restrictions, food wastage, and volatile prices from demand-supply feedbacks ( Harris, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%