2017
DOI: 10.3390/nu9050494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Sources of Energy and Nutrients in Infants, Toddlers, and Young Children from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2012

Abstract: Food sources of nutrients in Mexican children are not well known. To fill the knowledge gap, dietary intake was assessed in 2057 children using a 24-h dietary recall. All reported foods and beverages were assigned to one of 76 food groups. Percent contribution of each food group to nutrient intake was estimated for four age groups: 0–5.9, 6–11.9, 12–23.9, and 24–47.9 months. Breast milk, infant formula, and cow’s milk were the top sources of energy and nutrients, especially in younger groups. Among infants age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(59 reference statements)
6
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is comparable with the %TEI from USFB among 12–23 month olds reported in other low‐income and middle‐income settings, which range from 9% to 40%, with a median of 19% (Anderson, Cornwall, Jack, & Gibson, ; Denney, Afeiche, Eldridge, & Villalpando‐Carrión, ; Jeharsae, Sangthong, & Chongsuvivatwong, ; Karnopp et al, ; Kavle et al, ; Lander et al, ; Roche, Creed‐Kanashiro, Tuesta, & Kuhlein, ; Rodríguez‐Ramírez, Muñoz‐Espinosa, Rivera, González‐Castell, & González de Cosío, ; Valmórbida & Vitolo, ), and is also comparable with toddlers and school‐age children in high‐income settings (Kant, ; Webb et al, ). The higher %TEI‐NBF from USFB among 18–23 month olds as compared with 12–17 month olds observed in this study is consistent with intakes reported in high‐income settings (Hamner, Perrine, Gupta, Herrick, & Cogswell, ) and general trends of increased USFB consumption with age in LMIC settings (Denney et al, ; Lander et al, ), including Nepal (Pries et al, ). This relationship likely relates to introduction of new foods/flavours and incorporation of family foods into the diet as a child ages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It is comparable with the %TEI from USFB among 12–23 month olds reported in other low‐income and middle‐income settings, which range from 9% to 40%, with a median of 19% (Anderson, Cornwall, Jack, & Gibson, ; Denney, Afeiche, Eldridge, & Villalpando‐Carrión, ; Jeharsae, Sangthong, & Chongsuvivatwong, ; Karnopp et al, ; Kavle et al, ; Lander et al, ; Roche, Creed‐Kanashiro, Tuesta, & Kuhlein, ; Rodríguez‐Ramírez, Muñoz‐Espinosa, Rivera, González‐Castell, & González de Cosío, ; Valmórbida & Vitolo, ), and is also comparable with toddlers and school‐age children in high‐income settings (Kant, ; Webb et al, ). The higher %TEI‐NBF from USFB among 18–23 month olds as compared with 12–17 month olds observed in this study is consistent with intakes reported in high‐income settings (Hamner, Perrine, Gupta, Herrick, & Cogswell, ) and general trends of increased USFB consumption with age in LMIC settings (Denney et al, ; Lander et al, ), including Nepal (Pries et al, ). This relationship likely relates to introduction of new foods/flavours and incorporation of family foods into the diet as a child ages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Four studies presented differences in % TEI from snacks/SSB across age groups, with most showing an increase in % TEI from such foods among older children. Across the entire complementary feeding period, Lander et al () and Denney et al () found that % TEI from snack foods and SSB increased with age (27.0% among 6‐ to 8‐month‐olds vs. 35.0% among 9‐ to 11‐month‐olds vs. 40.0% among 12‐ to 23‐month‐olds; and 8.0% among 6‐ to 11‐month‐olds vs. 19.6% among 12‐ to 23‐month‐olds, respectively). However, a decrease in % TEI from processed snack foods/SBB with age was shown by Kavle et al () in rural and periurban Egypt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations in study design, particularly related to sampling and measurement, challenge the ability to draw conclusions across papers identified in this review. Among the nine studies assessing % TEI from snack foods/SSB, only two provided nationally representative estimates, both from Mexico (Denney et al, ; Rodríguez‐Ramírez et al, ). Three of the remaining studies assessed nonrandom samples, including convenience samples of stunted children and mothers attending health services (Anderson et al, ; Roche et al, ; Valmórbida & Vitolo, ), limiting conclusions from these papers to wider populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations