2001
DOI: 10.1080/09386491.2001.11826873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Safety in Modern Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The audit stage may be followed by certification activities [15,16], which indicate directly to the consumer the fact that the food is safe. In spite of the fact that the increase of consumer awareness in the field of general food safety is observed around the world [28][29][30] it should be stated that in Poland, consumers are not aware of the existence, role and functioning of veterinary control of animal foodstuffs, regardless of its high efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The audit stage may be followed by certification activities [15,16], which indicate directly to the consumer the fact that the food is safe. In spite of the fact that the increase of consumer awareness in the field of general food safety is observed around the world [28][29][30] it should be stated that in Poland, consumers are not aware of the existence, role and functioning of veterinary control of animal foodstuffs, regardless of its high efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another outbreak of Minamata disease took place in Niigata Prefecture in 1965, again caused by mercury discharge, and again industry hindered the process of identification and treatment: current estimates of both outbreaks indicate 2,002 dead out of 2,995 total victims (Japan Times 21 February 2006). Other scandals include the Morinaga milk incident in 1955, when 138 babies were killed due to arsenic contamination of milk, and the Kanemi rice oil incident in 1968, which led to 1,900 recognised cases of poisoning (Jussaume et al 1999). More recently, the Snow Brand Milk incident in 2000 poisoned 14,780 people due to a bacterial contamination in processed milk which was covered-up by company officials.…”
Section: Risk Food Security and Food Terrorismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To summarize: existing studies suggest in comparative terms that consumers in Japan tend to exhibit a more cautious stance towards genetically modified food than consumers in the other countries studied, and that these attitudes are shaped in part by respondents' individual attributes, such as their household situation, whether they have children, their income, and other socio-economic variables. At the same time, it is important to note that these types of concerns, particularly with regard to genetically modified foods, are strongly influenced by the activities of consumer and environmental movements which have mobilized people to generate societal debates about genetically modified foods (Jussaume et al 2001). These studies suggest that Japanese consumers may take a more cautious approach to gene editing technologies (or cisgenics) than consumers in other countries.…”
Section: Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%