2005
DOI: 10.1675/1524-4695(2005)028[0035:fpando]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Provisioning and Nestling Diet of the Black Stork in the Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, nest visitation rates are highly variable between and among species, with some following a bimodal distribution (e.g. Knapton 1984;Conder 1989;Aguilera 1990;Hampl et al 2005), and others showing the peak of parental nest visits being in the middle of the day (Hoffman 1959;Rytkönen et al 1996) or a morning peak followed by a slow decline over the course of the day (Cowie and Hinsley 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, nest visitation rates are highly variable between and among species, with some following a bimodal distribution (e.g. Knapton 1984;Conder 1989;Aguilera 1990;Hampl et al 2005), and others showing the peak of parental nest visits being in the middle of the day (Hoffman 1959;Rytkönen et al 1996) or a morning peak followed by a slow decline over the course of the day (Cowie and Hinsley 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although one could expect a similar pattern in a closely related species, the breeding and foraging strategies of the two European storks are very different. Nests of the Black Stork are located in the forest and it forages mainly upon small fish and other small aquatic animals, which are collected in shallow water bodies and wetlands (Zawadzka et al 1990;Lõhmus and Sellis 2001;Hampl et al 2005;Strazds 2011). Comparatively, the White Stork nests are located in open places and it also forages in open landscapes, preferably in wet meadows, quite close to the nest (Cramp and Simmons 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A food item was defined as the fraction of the bolus handled and finally swallowed by an individual chick. Data from video recordings allowed determining the composition of 40 feedings at 28 different nests (for the validity of this method see Hampl et al and Dolata ). Classification of prey types was based on information on nestling diet collected by the neck‐collar method during the 2002 breeding season.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A food item was defined as the fraction of the bolus handled and finally swallowed by an individual chick. Data from video recordings allowed determining the composition of 40 feedings at 28 different nests (for the validity of this method see Hampl et al 2005 nestling identification and video recording. This pilot study included recordings at 15 broods 1-6 weeks old but these were not included in the analysed sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%