2019
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food: Location, Location, Location

Abstract: This article examines the question of why local food has become, for many activists and scholars, a core concept for understanding food systems and globalization and for challenging systems of injustice and inequality. I begin with the French concept of terroir, which is often translated as the “taste of place,” and examine why this term, part of France's cultural common sense, is difficult to implement in other places. I then consider efforts to use local foods to grapple with the forces of globalization and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have underlined that SFSCs may enact different types of proximity-geographical, relational or organised, among others [15]; others have distinguished between "local food" and "locality food" [16], or "locally produced food for local consumers" and "locally produced food for distant consumers" [17], variations which stress the complexity of trying to delimit the meaning of "local". Often, subjective, less quantifiable dimensions influence the construction of the "local" in SFSCs: these include, among others, the understanding of place as a socio-cultural construction [18][19][20], producers' [21] and intermediaries' [22] spatial perceptions and how these affect their mobility, consumers' spatial perceptions and their impact on food procurement strategies [23] and the role of knowledge-based relations between local actors [17]. In the European GLAMUR FP7 project, Brunori et al [11] demonstrate that local and global chains, in practice, are far from being mutually exclusive or opposed.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Sfscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have underlined that SFSCs may enact different types of proximity-geographical, relational or organised, among others [15]; others have distinguished between "local food" and "locality food" [16], or "locally produced food for local consumers" and "locally produced food for distant consumers" [17], variations which stress the complexity of trying to delimit the meaning of "local". Often, subjective, less quantifiable dimensions influence the construction of the "local" in SFSCs: these include, among others, the understanding of place as a socio-cultural construction [18][19][20], producers' [21] and intermediaries' [22] spatial perceptions and how these affect their mobility, consumers' spatial perceptions and their impact on food procurement strategies [23] and the role of knowledge-based relations between local actors [17]. In the European GLAMUR FP7 project, Brunori et al [11] demonstrate that local and global chains, in practice, are far from being mutually exclusive or opposed.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Sfscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wylie (2007) suggests that food, as well as landscapes become "a reflection in the common and collective circles of cultural meaning". The works of Barham and Sylvander (2011), Bowen and Mutersbaugh (2014), Berriss (2019) demonstrate deep interest in studying the places where products come from. Food products that originate from certain landscapes are called "landscape products" (Ilbery and Kneafsey , 1999).…”
Section: Analysis Of Recent Research and Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an effect of such a process, authors such as McMichael (1996) point out that communities must reposition themselves through niches to resist globalization's pressure. Furthermore, such a process demands local, regional and national identities to sustain culture-related food (Beriss 2019). Through this it becomes clear that globalization impacts nation states differently in terms of their global position and pushes the market towards niche formation to preserve culture-related agrifood products such as GI.…”
Section: Production Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%