2012
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2011.632000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Fight! The Swedish Low-Carb/High Fat (LCHF) Movement and the Turning of Science Popularisation Against the Scientists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays a variety of diet regimes are discussed. Gunnarsson and Elam (2012), for example, discuss the "food fight" between the LCHF (Low Carb High Fat) movement and the established dietary advisors. The nutritional aspects of the meal were almost left out of discussions at the research circle meetings.…”
Section: Making Mealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nowadays a variety of diet regimes are discussed. Gunnarsson and Elam (2012), for example, discuss the "food fight" between the LCHF (Low Carb High Fat) movement and the established dietary advisors. The nutritional aspects of the meal were almost left out of discussions at the research circle meetings.…”
Section: Making Mealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diet stands for losing weight by refraining from carbohydrates whilst continuing to enjoy fat. Gunnarsson and Elam (2012) described from a sociological perspective the ongoing "food fight" between the LCHF movement and established dietary expertise in Sweden. There are two aspects to this: The first is a debunking of the established dietary advice for failing to live up to idealized standards of "sound science."…”
Section: Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they look nostalgically back to an ill‐defined pre‐agricultural ‘paleolithic’ hunter‐gatherer era, where humans thrived on diets high in animal protein and fats (Knight , ). They mobilise the rhetorics and authority of science to articulate an angry critique of conventional high‐carbohydrate, low‐fat nutritional advice, which they hold as culpable for rising obesity rates and its presumed health consequences (Gunnarsson and Elam , Jauho ).…”
Section: Giving Up Sugarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These appeals operate not as a critique of science per se, but of what they see as a corrupt and flawed science‐in‐practice, subject to the corruptive influences and desires of politics and big business. In their study of the Swedish LCHF movement, Gunnarsson and Elam (: 319) describe advocates as ‘inventive popularisers of science’ who have ‘succeeded to some degree in turning a conventional tool of incumbent scientific authority into a weapon to be turned back against this authority’. As Jauho () observes in his study of low‐carb dieters’ narratives of science, these are invitations to a social construction of competence – discursive moves which not only legitimate a dissenting position, but also construct an identity through the appropriation of the symbolic cultural capital afforded by the command of the scientific idiom.…”
Section: Giving Up Sugarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Huhta, 2013. ) Samanlaisia tuloksia on nähtävissä myös karppauksen tutkimuksessa Ruotsissa (Gunnarsson & Elam, 2012). Ruotsalainen karppausliike on onnistunut tehokkaasti puhuttelemaan yleisöä Vanhasta tieteen ja toimittajien kontrolloimasta julkisuudesta on siirrytty monisuuntaiseen viestintään, jossa itse kullakin henkilöllä on mahdollisuus saattaa viestinsä olemattomilla kustannuksilla lähes koko ihmiskunnan saataville.…”
Section: Teoriaa Ja Ajattelumallejaunclassified