2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12393-015-9125-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Engineering at Multiple Scales: Case Studies, Challenges and the Future—A European Perspective

Abstract: A selection of Food Engineering research including food structure engineering, novel emulsification processes, liquid and dry fractionation, Food Engineering challenges and research with comments on European Food Engineering education is covered. Food structure engineering is discussed by using structure formation in freezing and dehydration processes as examples for mixing of water as powder and encapsulation and protection of sensitive active components. Furthermore, a strength parameter is defined for the q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, freeze‐dried products are rehydrated prior to their use to recover the properties of the fresh product (Krokida & Philippopoulos, ; Prosapio & Norton, , ). In this framework, a distributed manufacturing model could represent an interesting alternative (Baldea, Edgar, Stanley, & Kiss, ; Roos et al, ). In this model, only valuable ingredients are shipped and any other additive or component (such as water) can be added later at the local level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, freeze‐dried products are rehydrated prior to their use to recover the properties of the fresh product (Krokida & Philippopoulos, ; Prosapio & Norton, , ). In this framework, a distributed manufacturing model could represent an interesting alternative (Baldea, Edgar, Stanley, & Kiss, ; Roos et al, ). In this model, only valuable ingredients are shipped and any other additive or component (such as water) can be added later at the local level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed by Roos et al (2016) and Flynn et al (2013), the approach of academia and industry proves to be a determining factor in the professional training of the engineer.…”
Section: Ijfsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This result indicates a considerable concern for the solid formation of basic or initial concepts, in addition to providing a foundation for an improved learning experience of supplementary fields encountered by the student. Part of the discussion takes place at international debates (Besterfield-Sacre et al, 2014;Roos et al, 2016;Saguy & Cohen, 2016), which have argued that the solution to increasingly complex problems is the deepening of basic sciences, such as mathematics, statistics, Engineering Sciences represent 24.3% of the average workload of the 21 analyzed programs. Moreover, as shown in Figure 5, this field of knowledge displayed a higher percentage in programs rated as five stars than in the combined averages of programs rated as five and four stars.…”
Section: Fields Of Knowledge Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result indicates a considerable concern for the solid formation of basic or initial concepts, in addition to providing a foundation for an improved learning experience of supplementary fields encountered by the student. Part of the discussion takes place at international debates (Besterfield-Sacre et al, 2014;Roos et al, 2016;Saguy & Cohen, 2016), which have argued that the solution to increasingly complex problems is the deepening of basic sciences, such as mathematics, statistics, IJFS October 2018 Volume 7 pages [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] An analysis of food engineering education in Brazil 11 Figure 4: Comparative analysis of the Engineering program curriculum: very good (four stars) and excellent (five stars), considering nine fields of knowledge. Source: The authors, based on information available on the websites of the analyzed programs Engineering Sciences represent 24.3% of the average workload of the 21 analyzed programs.…”
Section: Fields Of Knowledge Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%