Food and nutrition security policies in the Caribbean: Challenging the corporate food regime?

Abstract

Trinidad and Tobago is contributing to climate change by maintaining a model for food security that is based on corporate controls over food and agriculture. With policy documents, media sources, and ethnographic data, I argue that Trinidad and Tobago's food system is connected to national and transnational markets that firmly affix the country's food system to the fossil fuel economy. Three examples are provided. The first is the adoption of the World Bank's 'value chain' model for agriculture, which favours larger, economically (rather than ecologically) efficient farmers. The second is the recent state-led campaign to 'put T&T on your table', which overlooks the political prioritisation of industrial food imports exemplified by current policies to eliminate VAT (Value Added Tax) on industrial food imports. The final example is the November 2013 Memorandum of Understanding between Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana, under which Guyanese lands are being converted for the industrial production of corn, soya, and other crops for final processing and consumption in Trinidad and Tobago. While such policies are justified under the label of national and regional food security, I argue that they perpetuate a Caribbean-style corporate food regime that counteracts more climate-sensitive efforts to create sustainable producer-consumer networks.

A relational view of climate adaptation in the private sector: How do value chain interactions shape business perceptions of climate risk and adaptive behaviours?

“…At the global scale, it demonstrates how actors can be exposed to cascades of climate-related risks, with limited capacity to rapidly adapt to them (Challinor et al, 2018;Helbing, 2013). At the regional level, this reflects the Caribbean's long-term dependency on global markets for imports of primary commodities (either raw or semiprocessed), like feed corn (Wilson, 2016;Beckford & Campbell, 2013).…”

Still searching for (food) sovereignty: Why are radical discourses only partially mobilised in the independent Anglo-Caribbean?

“…Cuba and Haiti are, however, highly distinctive in terms of their size, their Spanish and French colonial histories, and the character of their peasantries, and therefore, do not carry obvious lessons for the experience of the considerably smaller Angloislands. In this regard, Weis (2004) and Wilson (2016), on Jamaica and T&T respectively, suggest food and agricultural reforms based on neoliberal logics have done little to help the poor farmer or the environment. Less attention, though, is focused on the broader functioning of food sovereignty across the independent Anglo-Caribbean, a gap that this paper addresses.…”

Donor approaches to food security in the Pacific: Sustainable development goal 2 and the need for more inclusive agricultural development

“…They argue that this view is being contested amid mounting concerns about social, health and environmental pressures on food supply. These concerns include the heavy dependence of industrial agriculture on fossil fuels and how this dependence contributes to climate change (Wilson, 2016). Thus new and more complex policy analysis is needed (Lang and Barling, 2012).…”