2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food allergy: Stakeholder perspectives on acceptable risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, these policies are often perceived as extreme in the literature, in the media, and by the nonallergic population (86). The inflated perception of risk of severe food allergies in the general population (85,87) has resulted in several debates related to protection vs rights, particularly around the policies developed in response to the disproportionate burden of food allergies in children (88).…”
Section: General Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these policies are often perceived as extreme in the literature, in the media, and by the nonallergic population (86). The inflated perception of risk of severe food allergies in the general population (85,87) has resulted in several debates related to protection vs rights, particularly around the policies developed in response to the disproportionate burden of food allergies in children (88).…”
Section: General Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently a great deal of time and effort being invested in trying to determine when PAL statements should be applied [15][16][17] and recently we have seen the development of allergen management thresholds or reference doses. The reference dose contains individual participant data on the minimal eliciting dose based on the first objective reaction that occurred during clinical double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges [11].…”
Section: Is There a Substantial Risk To The Food Allergic Consumer Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such tools could also be considered for application by the food industry or health professionals. Finally, combining risk assessment modelling and cost-benefit analysis in the same project will favour exchanges in order to set management options which will be studied in terms of risk and socio-economic impact (Madsen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Coupling Risk Assessment and Cost/benefit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%