The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.17811/rifie.48.4.2019.419-434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fomento de la alfabetización de datos en todos los ámbitos

Abstract: A medida que las tecnologías proliferan en nuestra sociedad, el mundo está cada vez más interconectado y se recopilan grandes cantidades de datos que contienen información y conocimientos valiosos. Esta creciente cantidad de datos ya ha sido reconocida como un recurso con un gran potencial de aumentar la eficiencia y la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones, las ciudades y las sociedades. Están apareciendo nuevos trabajos dedicados a los datos, y personas que no son expertas en datos deben leer y gestionar dato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the reviewed publications suffer from some shortcomings, such as the absence of previous supporting publications, a scarcity of critical spirit in relation to DL, and infrequent definition of specific disciplinary frameworks, among others, some avenues of discussion can be surmised. Gaps have been identified linked to the limitations of general frameworks for addressing DL in specialized disciplines and settings (Špiranec et al, 2019;O'Neill, 2019;Koltay, 2023;Valverde et al, 2022). In fact, five articles using the ACRL framework as a reference complement it with more specific ones: geospatial information (Appel, 2020), business data (Condon;Pothier, 2022), digital humanities (Locke, 2017), maps (Rutkowski; Williams, 2020), and GIS (Widener; Reese, 2016).…”
Section: Evidence and Gaps In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the reviewed publications suffer from some shortcomings, such as the absence of previous supporting publications, a scarcity of critical spirit in relation to DL, and infrequent definition of specific disciplinary frameworks, among others, some avenues of discussion can be surmised. Gaps have been identified linked to the limitations of general frameworks for addressing DL in specialized disciplines and settings (Špiranec et al, 2019;O'Neill, 2019;Koltay, 2023;Valverde et al, 2022). In fact, five articles using the ACRL framework as a reference complement it with more specific ones: geospatial information (Appel, 2020), business data (Condon;Pothier, 2022), digital humanities (Locke, 2017), maps (Rutkowski; Williams, 2020), and GIS (Widener; Reese, 2016).…”
Section: Evidence and Gaps In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%