Cardiac Pacing and ICDs 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119578376.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follow‐up of the patient with a CIED

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CIED follow-up was performed according to current guidelines, which uses blended in-clinic and remote follow-up for patients with high-voltage devices, and at least annual in-clinic follow-up for low-voltage devices. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The occurrence of ELAs and the proposed response was determined through review of device interrogations obtained at each follow-up visit contained in the Paceart database. This included remote and in-clinic visits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CIED follow-up was performed according to current guidelines, which uses blended in-clinic and remote follow-up for patients with high-voltage devices, and at least annual in-clinic follow-up for low-voltage devices. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The occurrence of ELAs and the proposed response was determined through review of device interrogations obtained at each follow-up visit contained in the Paceart database. This included remote and in-clinic visits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the positioning of the implanted device should be assessed on the following day by posterior–anterior and lateral chest radiographs. The secured device can maintain efficacy and safety, reducing the patient's risk of becoming a victim to excluding pneumothorax (Sridhar & Patton, 2020; Swerdlow & Ellenbogen, 2013). In addition, for ICD and CRT devices, the follow‐up visit has a general interval period of 3–6 months, which usually brings out some drawbacks, such as minimal availability of physicians and resources, no track record and surveillance between two follow‐up visits.…”
Section: Remote Monitoring (Rm) Of Ciedsmentioning
confidence: 99%