Proceedings of 1993 5th IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing
DOI: 10.1109/spdp.1993.395482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Folded Petersen cube networks: new competitors for the hypercubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the Binary Hypercube (BHC) [8], the Generalized Hypercube (GHC) [12], the Torus [34], the Spanning Bus Hypercube (SBH) [21], the Hierarchical Cubic Network (HCN) [9], the Cube-Connected-Cycle (CCC) [35], the Hyper-deBruijn (HdB) [36], the Folded Peterson (FPT) [37], the Hypermesh (HM) [33], and the Optical Multi-Mesh Hypercube (OMMH) [17]. The comparison parameters include diameter, degree, number of links, average message distance, average traffic density, and queuing delay.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Smlh With Popular Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the Binary Hypercube (BHC) [8], the Generalized Hypercube (GHC) [12], the Torus [34], the Spanning Bus Hypercube (SBH) [21], the Hierarchical Cubic Network (HCN) [9], the Cube-Connected-Cycle (CCC) [35], the Hyper-deBruijn (HdB) [36], the Folded Peterson (FPT) [37], the Hypermesh (HM) [33], and the Optical Multi-Mesh Hypercube (OMMH) [17]. The comparison parameters include diameter, degree, number of links, average message distance, average traffic density, and queuing delay.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Smlh With Popular Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bidirectional ring topology is more scalable, but it is not fault-tolerant. Hypercube [2] and its variants FPCN [3], de Bruijn [4] and its variants , Kautz [5] and ShuffleNet [6] have a number of node restrictions. They are either not scalable or not faulttolerant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bidirectional ring topology is more scalable, but it is not fault-tolerant. Hypercube [2] and its variants [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], FPCN [11], de Bruijn [12] and its variants [13,14], Kautz [15] and ShuffleNet [16] have a number of node restrictions. They are either not scalable or not fault-tolerant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%