2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2013.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focusing singularity in a derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation

Abstract: Abstract. We present a numerical study of a derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a general power nonlinearity, |ψ| 2σ ψ x . In the L 2 -supercritical regime, σ > 1, our simulations indicate that there is a finite time singularity. We obtain a precise description of the local structure of the solution in terms of blowup rate and asymptotic profile, in a form similar to that of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with supercritical power law nonlinearity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that for n = 4, the asymptotic description of theorem 1 still applies though the studied initial data are very far from the soliton. Note, however, that derivative NLS equations show a very similar behavior as gKdV equations, i.e., both dispersive shocks and blow-up as can be seen for instance in [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We show that for n = 4, the asymptotic description of theorem 1 still applies though the studied initial data are very far from the soliton. Note, however, that derivative NLS equations show a very similar behavior as gKdV equations, i.e., both dispersive shocks and blow-up as can be seen for instance in [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Whether DNLS exhibits finite-time blowup solutions for initial data with large mass remains an important open question. A numerical study by Liu, Simpson and Sulem [28] indicates that there is finite time singularity for the L 2 -supercritical nonlinearity i|u| 2σ ∂ x u, σ > 1. We also refer to [5] for a further numerical investigation of the structure of the singular profile near blowup times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were, unfortunately, unable to show that the H 1 solutions belonged to C(0, T ; H 1 ). Our H 2 solutions are a step toward the justifying the time-dependent simulations appearing in [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Such a higher regularity result is of interest in light of the time dependent simulations in [18,19]. In those works, the pseudospectral method was used, which exactly corresponds to the Fourier cutoff mollifier of our analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation