2016
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focal Seizures Induced by Intracranial Electroencephalogram Grids

Abstract: Here we present a unique, but important seizure variant directly related to placement of subdural grids. Two distinct epileptogenic zones were identified, one which correlated with the patient’s baseline seizures and a separate zone associated with atypical semiology and localization. Inspection of this zone at surgery revealed cortical deformation from the grid itself. The patient underwent successful surgical resection of the primary epileptogenic zone, but not that of the atypical zone. She remains seizure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While iEEG can record seizures at high spatial and temporal resolution, it has important limitations. For example, seizures are often provoked during the recording period via medication withdrawal and sleep deprivation; in some patients, these provoked seizures may be fundamentally different from stereotypical spontaneous seizures, and can misinform localization attempts (Hudgins et al, 2016). Additionally, seizure provocation and prolonged implantation while waiting to record seizures increases the risk of complications such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, musculoskeletal injury, and postictal psychosis (Sperling, 1997; Hamer et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While iEEG can record seizures at high spatial and temporal resolution, it has important limitations. For example, seizures are often provoked during the recording period via medication withdrawal and sleep deprivation; in some patients, these provoked seizures may be fundamentally different from stereotypical spontaneous seizures, and can misinform localization attempts (Hudgins et al, 2016). Additionally, seizure provocation and prolonged implantation while waiting to record seizures increases the risk of complications such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, musculoskeletal injury, and postictal psychosis (Sperling, 1997; Hamer et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, seizures are often provoked during the recording period via medication withdrawal and sleep deprivation; in some patients, these provoked seizures may be fundamentally different from stereotypical spontaneous seizures, with the potential to misinform localization attempts. 7 Additionally, seizure provocation and prolonged implantation while waiting to record seizures increases the risk of complications such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, musculoskeletal injury, and postictal psychosis. 8,9 In some cases, seizures may not occur during the implant period, rendering the study inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the SOZ may not represent the full EZ extent, and its delineation requires the recording of several stereotyped seizures at the expense of considerable human and nancial resources 49 . Moreover, seizures are provoked through withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs and sleep deprivation 9 ; these seizures may be fundamentally different from the stereotypical spontaneous seizures of the patient and thus can misinform localization attempts 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%