2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foaming Effect of a Polymer Precursor with a Low N Content on Fabrication of N-Doped Porous Carbons for CO2 Capture

Abstract: Because of their sufficient surface areas, developed porosities, and high stabilities, N-doped porous carbons (NDPCs) have presented an excellent CO2 adsorption ability. NDPCs are usually fabricated through the carbonization of N-containing polymers. The effect of N species enlarging surface areas and foaming pores has been confirmed. However, traditional polymer precursors of NDPCs must have a relatively high N content and give unsatisfactory structural characters and CO2 capacities of their NDPCs. In this st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24,30,66 Because of having a higher surface area, MOF-808(Zr) has a higher CO 2 uptake capacity (1.61 mmol g −1 ) than that of MOF-808(Hf) (1.45 mmol g −1 , Figure 6c, Table S3). The CO 2 uptake capacity is much higher than polymeric ionic liquid PAPIL-2 (0.15 mmol g −1 ) 67 and PIM-1 (1.66 mmol g −1 ) 68 but fairly lower than NDPC-700 (3.8 mmol g −1 ), 69 SIFSIX-2-Cu-i (∼2.39 mmol g −1 ), 70 Mg 2 (dobdc)-(N 2 H 4 ) 2 (∼5.18 mmol g −1 ), 71 and Mg 2 (dobdc) (∼5.91 mmol g −1 ). 72 However, MOF-808(Zr) shows a comparable CO 2 uptake capacity to that of UiO-66(Zr) (1.79 mmol g −1 ) despite its higher BET surface area, 73 indicating its weaker interactions due to the enlarged pore size unfavorable for low-pressure gas storage applications.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,30,66 Because of having a higher surface area, MOF-808(Zr) has a higher CO 2 uptake capacity (1.61 mmol g −1 ) than that of MOF-808(Hf) (1.45 mmol g −1 , Figure 6c, Table S3). The CO 2 uptake capacity is much higher than polymeric ionic liquid PAPIL-2 (0.15 mmol g −1 ) 67 and PIM-1 (1.66 mmol g −1 ) 68 but fairly lower than NDPC-700 (3.8 mmol g −1 ), 69 SIFSIX-2-Cu-i (∼2.39 mmol g −1 ), 70 Mg 2 (dobdc)-(N 2 H 4 ) 2 (∼5.18 mmol g −1 ), 71 and Mg 2 (dobdc) (∼5.91 mmol g −1 ). 72 However, MOF-808(Zr) shows a comparable CO 2 uptake capacity to that of UiO-66(Zr) (1.79 mmol g −1 ) despite its higher BET surface area, 73 indicating its weaker interactions due to the enlarged pore size unfavorable for low-pressure gas storage applications.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal adsorption solution theory (IAST) was applied to determine the CO 2 /N 2 selectivity, which was crucial for practical applications. , In Figure d, the N 2 adsorption capacity of NDPC-1-800 was much lower than its CO 2 uptake rather than that of NDPC-1-800 in Figure c, indicating the high CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of NDPC-1-800. Moreover, the dual-site Langmuir–Freundlich (DSLF) model was taken in Figure c,d for fitting the adsorption isotherms of CO 2 and N 2 , which could describe these adsorptions more accurately .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 illustrates the literature of various carbon-based adsorbents along with their surface area used for CO 2 uptake. [167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175][176]…”
Section: Porous Carbon-based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%