2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foaming and interfacial properties of hydrolyzed β-lactoglobulin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield (overrun) or expansion percentage, a major feature studied to evaluate the efficiency of the foaming method, is defined based on the volume of foam formed under fixed conditions (Davis et al 2005;Marinova et al 2009). The expansion percentages found in this work ranged from 25.75 (EGG-10-5) to 566.43 (EMU-10-20) for foams of yacon juice and from 94.40 (EGG-10-5) to 506.54 (EGG-20-20) for foams of concentrated yacon juice (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield (overrun) or expansion percentage, a major feature studied to evaluate the efficiency of the foaming method, is defined based on the volume of foam formed under fixed conditions (Davis et al 2005;Marinova et al 2009). The expansion percentages found in this work ranged from 25.75 (EGG-10-5) to 566.43 (EMU-10-20) for foams of yacon juice and from 94.40 (EGG-10-5) to 506.54 (EGG-20-20) for foams of concentrated yacon juice (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the composition of the sap, this surface tension reduction is probably because of protein adsorption. [21][22][23] The level of equilibrium surface activity of the typical proteins (∼45 mN/m) used in food industry, such as milk and egg proteins, is rather low compared with sap proteins. 21,22,24 Nevertheless, it is important to note that sap solutions are not pure protein solutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such treatments generally increase the surface activity of the proteins but they may compromise their ability to form coherent films -in general, film viscoelastic moduli decrease as the molecular weight of the adsorbing polymer decreases. However, provided the hydrolysis is limited, the hydrolysates can exhibit higher ε i and foam stabilizing effects than the corresponding native proteins [76][77][78]. The effects of non-adsorbing polysaccharides on the interfacial rheology of adsorbed films formed from protein hydrolysates are naturally different from the effects on the non-hydrolysed protein films, due to different efficiencies of electrostatic bonding between the protein moieties and polysaccharide in the bulk and at the interface [78].…”
Section: Effects Of Cross-linking Within Protein Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%