2014
DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2014-29-04-p689-699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foam forming revisited. Part II. Effect of surfactant on the properties of foam-formed paper products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, foam forming was studied extensively to develop the understanding of foam-fiber interactions (Al-Qararah et al 2012Lappalainen and Lehmonen 2012;Lappalainen et al 2014;Mira et al 2014) and also to find the potential applications of this technology in papermaking Lehmonen et al 2013;Poranen et al 2013) as well as other specialty products, e.g., filters and insulators (Cervin et al 2013;Jahangiri et al 2014). Foam was introduced to the paper industry already in the mid-1960s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recently, foam forming was studied extensively to develop the understanding of foam-fiber interactions (Al-Qararah et al 2012Lappalainen and Lehmonen 2012;Lappalainen et al 2014;Mira et al 2014) and also to find the potential applications of this technology in papermaking Lehmonen et al 2013;Poranen et al 2013) as well as other specialty products, e.g., filters and insulators (Cervin et al 2013;Jahangiri et al 2014). Foam was introduced to the paper industry already in the mid-1960s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, no wet pressing was applied in either process so as to leave a maximal trace of the foam-fiber interactions in the resulting network structure. Here the word "interaction" means any mutual influence between the two phases (foam and fibers) [12][13][14][15][16]. This influence may also be of geometric origin so that the bubble structure limits the orientation and movement of the fibers and vice verse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Besides the most common anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, C 12 H 25 SO 4 Na), [90] there are also many other options for foaming agent. [91][92][93][94] Industrially interesting examples are nonionic polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20), nonionic alkyl glucosides or alkyl polyglucosides (APGs), and nonionic polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH or PVA). The advantage of SDS is that it enables achieving high air content at low concentration due to its small molecular weight.…”
Section: Mixing Effects On Generated Foam Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laboratory-scale studies, the dosage of surfactant typically varies in the range of 0.3-4.0 g/l. [21,91] In the pilot and at the industrial scale, the surfactant level could be somewhat lower.…”
Section: Process Waters and Surfactant Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%