2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: Characterising BOLD signal changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

17
190
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
17
190
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Activation-induced changes in the transverse relaxation rate R2* (¼1/T2*) were found to scale linearly to hyperlinearly with respect to B 0 (10)(11)(12)(13). Comparison of skeletal muscle BOLD studies conducted at different field strengths also implies a particular dependence of the muscle BOLD effect on B 0 (2,3,14,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Activation-induced changes in the transverse relaxation rate R2* (¼1/T2*) were found to scale linearly to hyperlinearly with respect to B 0 (10)(11)(12)(13). Comparison of skeletal muscle BOLD studies conducted at different field strengths also implies a particular dependence of the muscle BOLD effect on B 0 (2,3,14,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Functional MR studies of the human brain have demonstrated that high field strengths of the static magnetic field (B 0 ) lead to higher signal-to-noise ratios and increased BOLD signal changes in activated brain areas (10)(11)(12)(13). Activation-induced changes in the transverse relaxation rate R2* (¼1/T2*) were found to scale linearly to hyperlinearly with respect to B 0 (10)(11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous acquisitions also avoid differences in spurious stimuli (Novitski et al, 2003), training or habituation effects (Debener et al, 2002) and other differences in subject performance (Boly et al, 2007). Considering fMRI, it is well known that a stronger static field B 0 results both in increased magnetization and in an accentuated BOLD effect, leading to super-linear gains in functional sensitivity (Turner et al, 1993;van der Zwaag et al, 2009). As a result, in recent years, fMRI studies conducted at ultra-high field have achieved sub-millimeter spatial resolution (Yacoub et al, 2008), and higher field strengths continue to be pursued (Deelchand et al, 2010;Duyn, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its relatively small size and fine-scale anatomical structure, compared to the cerebrum, cerebellar fMRI benefits strongly from high spatial resolution, both during acquisition [1,2] and in data post-processing strategies used in fMRI [3,4]. High spatial resolution in fMRI is most easily achieved at high field strengths, where fMRI benefits from increased signal-tonoise ratio (SNR), increased blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal [5,6] and increased spatial specificity of the BOLD responses [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%